Judicial recusal for prior client representation and application of quorum rules in Federal Constitutional Court fee determinations
Sintesi Legislator
Generato dall'IAThe Federal Constitutional Court set the subject matter values for attorney fees at €120,000 and €40,000 for two constitutional complaint proceedings, effectively resolving the procedural fee determination issue. The case involved a procedural motion for the establishment of "Gegenstandswert" in constitutional review cases, where the court assessed both the subjective and objective significance of the proceedings and the promotion of legal goals through specific advocacy. The decision was rendered in a reduced panel because a member of the court was recused pursuant to § 18 Abs. 1 Nr. 2 BVerfGG due to prior representation of the complainants, with the court explicitly noting that the procedural quorum rule of § 19 Abs. 4 BVerfGG did not apply analogously. The operative legal basis for the fee calculation relied on the established doctrine found in BVerfGE 79, 365, which mandates considering the relative importance of the constitutional questions and the specific anwaltliche Tätigkeit.
Regesto Legislator
Generato dall'IA§ 18 Abs. 1 Nr. 2 BVerfGG, § 19 Abs. 4 BVerfGG; Judicial recusal for prior client representation and application of quorum rules in Federal Constitutional Court fee determinations: The case involved a procedural motion for the establishment of "Gegenstandswert" in constitutional review cases, where the court assessed both the subjective and objective significance of the proceedings and the promotion of legal goals through specific advocacy. The decision was rendered in a reduced panel because a member of the court was recused pursuant to § 18 Abs. 1 Nr. 2 BVerfGG due to prior representation of the complainants, with the court explicitly noting that the procedural quorum rule of § 19 Abs. 4 BVerfGG did not apply analogously. The operative legal basis for the fee calculation relied on the established doctrine found in BVerfGE 79, 365, which mandates considering the relative importance of the constitutional questions and the specific anwaltliche Tätigkeit.
Parole chiave
Generato dall'IADisposizioni normative citate
Generato dall'IAGiurisprudenza citata
Generato dall'IADecisioni correlate
Generato dall'IAQuestioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator
Generato dall'IACited to exclude a judge from participating in the decision due to prior representation of the complainants.
Cited to determine that the provisions regarding quorum do not apply analogously to the reduced composition of the court.
Testo completo
Gegenstandswertfestsetzung im Verfassungsbeschwerdeverfahren
[TENOR]
Unter Berücksichtigung der subjektiven und objektiven Bedeutung der Verfahren und ihrer Förderung durch die jeweilige anwaltliche Tätigkeit (vgl. BVerfGE 79, 365 ) werden die Werte des Gegenstands der anwaltlichen Tätigkeit im Verfassungsbeschwerdeverfahren 1 BvR 2380/21 auf 120.000 Euro (in Worten: einhundertzwanzigtausend Euro) und im Verfahren 1 BvR 2449/21 auf 40.000 Euro (in Worten: vierzigtausend Euro) festgesetzt.
Richter Wolff ist im vorliegenden Verfahren nach § 18 Abs. 1 Nr. 2 BVerfGG von der Ausübung seines Richteramtes ausgeschlossen, weil er die Beschwerdeführerinnen zu I.1., 2. und 3. bis zu seiner Ernennung als Richter des Bundesverfassungsgerichts als Bevollmächtigter vertreten hat. Der Senat berät und entscheidet daher in verminderter Besetzung, § 19 Abs. 4 BVerfGG findet keine analoge Anwendung (vgl. BVerfGE 140, 115 m.w.N.).