Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
1 BvR 717/18 ECLI:DE:BVerfG:2022:rk20220223.1bvr071718 Generato dall'IA

Constitutional complaint on BVerfG admissibility requirements for amended broadcasting law regarding public service media app

Numero d'incarto 1 BvR 717/18
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Germania (DE)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Inammissibile (Inadmissible)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Federal Constitutional Court refused to accept the constitutional complaint for decision, rendering the decision final and unappealable, as the complaint was deemed inadmissible. The dispute concerned a challenge to the "Tagesschau" mobile application under the 22nd Interstate Treaty on Broadcasting, where the complainant alleged a violation of constitutional rights in light of the new media regulations. The decisive legal basis for the rejection was the failure to meet the specific substantive requirements of § 23 Abs. 1 Satz 2, § 92 BVerfGG; specifically, the complainant did not provide sufficient argumentation to demonstrate that the constitutional complaint remained admissible following the amendment of the telemedia law and the entry into force of the 22nd Interstate Treaty on Broadcasting on May 1, 2019.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

§ 92 BVerfGG, § 93d Abs. 1 Satz 3 BVerfGG; Constitutional complaint on BVerfG admissibility requirements for amended broadcasting law regarding public service media app: The dispute concerned a challenge to the "Tagesschau" mobile application under the 22nd Interstate Treaty on Broadcasting, where the complainant alleged a violation of constitutional rights in light of the new media regulations. The decisive legal basis for the rejection was the failure to meet the specific substantive requirements of § 23 Abs. 1 Satz 2, § 92 BVerfGG; specifically, the complainant did not provide sufficient argumentation to demonstrate that the constitutional complaint remained admissible following the amendment of the telemedia law and the entry into force of the 22nd Interstate Treaty on Broadcasting on May 1, 2019.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
diritto dei mezzi di comunicazione requisito costituzionale diritto di diffondere modifica dei trattati nuova domanda diritto di manifestare

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
§ 92 BVerfGG
1 Satz 2 Halbsatz 1, § 92 BVerfGG im Hinblick auf den aufgrund der Änderung der Sach- und Rechtslage nach Ablauf der Beschwerdefrist zu ergänzenden Vortrag (vgl.
§ 93d Abs. 1 Satz 3 BVerfGG
Cited in the dispositive to justify the omission of a further detailed written reasoning for the decision.

Giurisprudenza citata

Generato dall'IA
1 BvR 2771/18
Failure to substantiate state duty to balance Zero-Day exploitation for surveillance against IT system integrity renders constitutional complaint inadmissible
BVerfGE 106, 210
53, 57; BVerfGE 106, 210 ) nicht genügt und damit unzulässig ist.
Generato dall'IA
1 BvR 622/24
Constitutional admissibility of broadcasting fee challenge based on supervisory board composition and transparency
6 B 51/17
Constitutionality of residential broadcasting fee and admissibility of revision based on legislative process flaws and right-to-be-heard allegations.
1 BvR 2550/12
Subsidiarity of constitutional complaint against broadcasting fee state treaty; requirement to exhaust administrative remedies and hardship exemption applications.
1 BvR 1296/21, 1 BvR 1308/21
Constitutional challenge to automated periodic broadcasting fee data transfer from civil registries dismissed for failure to exhaust administrative remedies
1 BvR 168/20
Broadcasting fee assessment: refusal of non-acceptance of third repetitive constitutional complaint and warning of misuse fee

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
§ 93d Abs. 1 Satz 3 BVerfGG

Cited in the dispositive to justify the omission of a further detailed written reasoning for the decision.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Nichtannahmebeschluss: Verfassungsbeschwerde bzgl der "Tagesschau-App" unzulässig - insb unzureichende Darlegungen des Vorliegens der Annahmevoraussetzungen auch noch nach Inkrafttreten des 22. Rundfunkänderungsstaatsvertrags - Tenorbegründung

[TENOR]

Die Verfassungsbeschwerde wird nicht zur Entscheidung angenommen, da sie den Darlegungsanforderungen der § 23 Abs. 1 Satz 2 Halbsatz 1, § 92 BVerfGG im Hinblick auf den aufgrund der Änderung der Sach- und Rechtslage nach Ablauf der Beschwerdefrist zu ergänzenden Vortrag (vgl. BVerfG, Beschluss des Ersten Senats vom 8. Juni 2021 - 1 BvR 2771/18 -, Rn. 53, 57; BVerfGE 106, 210 ) nicht genügt und damit unzulässig ist. Insbesondere ist der Vortrag des Beschwerdeführers, dass trotz der Novellierung des Telemedienrechts durch den 22. Rundfunkänderungsstaatsvertrag, der zum 1. Mai 2019 in Kraft getreten ist, die Annahmevoraussetzungen der Verfassungsbeschwerde weiterhin gegeben seien, nicht hinreichend.

[GRUENDE]

Von einer weiteren Begründung wird nach § 93d Abs. 1 Satz 3 BVerfGG abgesehen.

Diese Entscheidung ist unanfechtbar.