Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
2 BvR 1514/21 ECLI:DE:BVerfG:2022:rk20220222.2bvr151421 Generato dall'IA

Repetition of constitutional interim order suspending civil court deadlines and oral hearing

Numero d'incarto 2 BvR 1514/21
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Germania (DE)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Accolto (Allowed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Federal Constitutional Court ordered the repetition of its interim measure from September 3, 2021, for a duration of up to six months pending a decision on the constitutional complaint, thereby keeping in force the suspension of deadlines set by the Karlsruhe Higher Regional Court and prohibiting the holding of scheduled oral hearings. The dispute involved a procedural safety interim application in a civil matter where the complainant had previously been denied legal aid by the specialized courts, leading the complainant to challenge the procedural conduct and deadlines imposed by the higher regional court. The decisive legal basis for the court's order is Section 32(6) sentence 2 of the Federal Constitutional Court Act, which permits the repetition of interim measures if the statutory prerequisites for their initial issuance remain fulfilled, relying on the established doctrine that such repetition is valid when the underlying need for procedural protection persists.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

§ 32 Absatz 6 Satz 2 Bundesverfassungsgerichtsgesetz; Repetition of constitutional interim order suspending civil court deadlines and oral hearing: The dispute involved a procedural safety interim application in a civil matter where the complainant had previously been denied legal aid by the specialized courts, leading the complainant to challenge the procedural conduct and deadlines imposed by the higher regional court. The decisive legal basis for the court's order is Section 32(6) sentence 2 of the Federal Constitutional Court Act, which permits the repetition of interim measures if the statutory prerequisites for their initial issuance remain fulfilled, relying on the established doctrine that such repetition is valid when the underlying need for procedural protection persists.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
misura cautelare decisioni incidentali udienza dibattimentale termini legali sospensione di pena causa civile

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
§ 32 Absatz 6 Satz 2 Bundesverfassungsgerichtsgesetz
Basis for ordering the repetition of the interim measure for up to six months pending the decision on the constitutional complaint.

Giurisprudenza citata

Generato dall'IA
BVerfGE 21, 50
BVerfGE 21, 50; 89, 113 ; 97, 102 ; BVerfG, Beschluss der 2.
2 BvR 1845/18
Interim suspension of extradition to Romania pending constitutional review; validity of interim order issued without reasoned grounds under BVerfGG
Generato dall'IA
2 BvR 829/24
Repetition of interim order suspending execution of custodial sentence pending constitutional complaint
2 BvR 1562/17
Extension of interim injunction for six months pending constitutional complaint decision
2 BvR 2061/19
Repetition of interim suspension of custodial sentence execution during pending constitutional review
2 BvR 1405/17
Repetition of interim injunction pending constitutional complaint review

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
§ 32 Absatz 6 Satz 2 Bundesverfassungsgerichtsgesetz

Basis for ordering the repetition of the interim measure for up to six months pending the decision on the constitutional complaint.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Wiederholung einer einstweiligen Anordnung: Eilantrag zur Verfahrenssicherung in einer Zivilsache nach fachgerichtlicher PKH-Versagung

[TENOR]

Die einstweilige Anordnung vom 3. September 2021 wird bis zu einer Entscheidung über die Verfassungsbeschwerde, längstens für die Dauer von sechs Monaten, wiederholt (§ 32 Absatz 6 Satz 2 Bundesverfassungsgerichtsgesetz).

[GRUENDE]

I. Das Bundesverfassungsgericht hat durch einstweilige Anordnung vom 3. September 2021 etwaige vom Oberlandesgericht Karlsruhe im Verfahren 1 U 20/19 gesetzte Fristen zur Stellungnahme für den Beschwerdeführer und insbesondere die am 7. Juli 2021 gesetzte und zuletzt am 30. August 2021 auf den 8. September 2021 verlängerte Frist bis zur Entscheidung über die Verfassungsbeschwerde, längstens für die Dauer von sechs Monaten, einstweilen für wirkungslos erklärt. Ferner hat die für den 20. September 2021 terminierte mündliche Verhandlung nicht durchgeführt werden dürfen, und weitere Verhandlungstermine dürfen während der Dauer der einstweiligen Verfügung nicht angesetzt werden.

II. Das Bundesverfassungsgericht kann eine einstweilige Anordnung dann wiederholen, wenn die gesetzlichen Voraussetzungen für den erstmaligen Erlass einer solchen Anordnung noch gegeben sind (vgl. BVerfGE 21, 50; 89, 113 ; 97, 102 ; BVerfG, Beschluss der 2. Kammer des Zweiten Senats vom 26. September 2019 - 2 BvR 1845/18 -, Rn. 2). Dies ist vorliegend der Fall. Zur Begründung wird auf den Beschluss vom 3. September 2021 verwiesen.