Admissibility of constitutional complaint for lack of acceptability threshold in unreasoned chamber decision

The Federal Constitutional Court declined to accept the constitutional complaint for a decision, rendering the ruling final and unappealable; consequently, the challenged decision from the lower instance remains in force as the complainant did not prevail. The case involved a constitutional complaint challenging an earlier judicial decision, though the specific subject matter and underlying facts are not detailed in the non-reasoned chamber decision. The legal basis for this outcome is the Court’s discretionary power to reject constitutional complaints that do not meet the threshold for substantive review, resulting in a non-acceptance ruling without provided grounds.