Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
2 BvQ 95/21 ECLI:DE:BVerfG:2021:qk20211020a.2bvq009521 Generato dall'IA

Interim injunction in immigration proceedings: statutory omission of reasoning under § 32 Abs. 5 BVerfGG

Numero d'incarto 2 BvQ 95/21
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Germania (DE)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Respinto (Dismissed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Federal Constitutional Court’s Second Senate, Second Chamber, dismissed the application for a temporary injunction (einstweilige Anordnung) without providing a substantive reasoning in the operative order, thereby upholding the status quo for the opposing party. The case involved an immigration law matter (ausländerrechtliche Sache) where the applicant sought urgent interim protection against a measure from prior proceedings. The decision was issued as a final, unchallengeable order, and in accordance with § 32 Abs. 5 S. 1 BVerfGG, the Court stated that a separate, detailed written justification for the dismissal would be transmitted to the parties.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

§ 32 Abs. 5 BVerfGG, § 32 Abs. 5 S 1 BVerfGG; Interim injunction in immigration proceedings: statutory omission of reasoning under § 32 Abs. 5 BVerfGG: The case involved an immigration law matter (ausländerrechtliche Sache) where the applicant sought urgent interim protection against a measure from prior proceedings. The decision was issued as a final, unchallengeable order, and in accordance with § 32 Abs. 5 S. 1 BVerfGG, the Court stated that a separate, detailed written justification for the dismissal would be transmitted to the parties.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
misura cautelare protezione provvisoria fondatezza materiale carcerazione in diritto degli stranieri protezione dalla disdetta divieto di espulsione dei cittadini

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
§ 32 Abs. 5 BVerfGG
Cited in the dispositive as the procedural basis for transmitting a separate, detailed written justification later.
§ 32 Abs. 5 S 1 BVerfGG
Cited in the dispositive to justify the immediate communication of the decision without a substantive reasoning.
Generato dall'IA
2 BvQ 24/18
Interim injunction for deportation: insufficient substantiation of Art. 6 GG family interference and unexhausted ordinary legal remedies
2 BvQ 55/22
Inadmissibility of interim relief in criminal proceedings for lack of substantiation on merits prospects
1 BvQ 4/17
Interim relief in expulsion proceedings: inadmissibility due to unexhausted ordinary legal remedies and lack of substantiation
2 BvQ 26/18
Interim relief under § 32 BVerfGG: Inadmissibility due to insufficient substantiation of prerequisites
2 BvQ 63/22
Constitutional complaint for interim relief rejected due to insufficient substantiation of § 32(1) BVerfGG requirements

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
§ 32 Abs. 5 S 1 BVerfGG

Cited in the dispositive to justify the immediate communication of the decision without a substantive reasoning.

§ 32 Abs. 5 BVerfGG

Cited in the dispositive as the procedural basis for transmitting a separate, detailed written justification later.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Ablehnung einer einstweiligen Anordnung in einer ausländerrechtlichen Sache - Bekanntgabe der Entscheidung ohne Begründung (§ 32 Abs 5 S 1 BVerfGG)

[TENOR]

Der Antrag auf Erlass einer einstweiligen Anordnung wird abgelehnt.

Eine Begründung des Beschlusses wird gesondert übermittelt (§ 32 Abs. 5 BVerfGG).

[GRUENDE]

Diese Entscheidung ist unanfechtbar.