Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
2 BvR 852/20 ECLI:DE:BVerfG:2021:rk20210108.2bvr085220 Generato dall'IA

Repetition of interim injunction suspending enforcement of foreign criminal sentence under § 32 Abs. 6 BVerfGG

Numero d'incarto 2 BvR 852/20
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Germania (DE)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Accolto (Allowed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Federal Constitutional Court ordered the repetition of a previous interim injunction until a decision on the main constitutional complaint, capped at a maximum duration of six months, thereby extending the suspension of the recognition and enforcement of a foreign criminal sentence and leaving the applicant's challenge pending. The dispute concerned the enforcement of an Italian imprisonment sentence in Germany, where the applicant challenged the domestic court decisions that had declared the enforcement admissible, arguing a violation of fundamental rights. The decisive legal basis was Section 32(6) Sentence 2 of the Federal Constitutional Court Act (BVerfGG), under which the court reiterated its prior ruling based on the continued existence of the prerequisites for granting interim relief, as established in the original order of July 14, 2020.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

§ 32 Abs. 6 Satz 2 BVerfGG; Repetition of interim injunction suspending enforcement of foreign criminal sentence under § 32 Abs. 6 BVerfGG: The dispute concerned the enforcement of an Italian imprisonment sentence in Germany, where the applicant challenged the domestic court decisions that had declared the enforcement admissible, arguing a violation of fundamental rights. The decisive legal basis was Section 32(6) Sentence 2 of the Federal Constitutional Court Act (BVerfGG), under which the court reiterated its prior ruling based on the continued existence of the prerequisites for granting interim relief, as established in the original order of July 14, 2020.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
esecuzione all'estero sospensione condizionale della pena esecuzione della sentenza procedimento sommario diritti fondamentali riconoscimento di decisioni straniere

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
§ 32 Abs. 6 Satz 2 BVerfGG
Procedural rule applied in the dispositive to order the repetition of the interim injunction until the decision on the merits or a maximum of six months.

Giurisprudenza citata

Generato dall'IA
BVerfGE 21, 50
BVerfGE 21, 50; 89, 113 ; 97, 102 ).
Generato dall'IA
2 BvR 2061/19
Interim injunction repetition: suspension of custodial sentence execution pending constitutional complaint

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
§ 32 Abs. 6 Satz 2 BVerfGG

Procedural rule applied in the dispositive to order the repetition of the interim injunction until the decision on the merits or a maximum of six months.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Wiederholung einer einstweiligen Anordnung: Aussetzung einer gerichtlichen Entscheidung, mit der die Vollstreckung eines ausländischen Strafurteils für zulässig erklärt wurde

[TENOR]

Die einstweilige Anordnung vom 14. Juli 2020 wird bis zu einer Entscheidung über die Verfassungsbeschwerde, längstens für die Dauer von sechs Monaten, wiederholt (§ 32 Abs. 6 Satz 2 BVerfGG).

[GRUENDE]

I. Das Bundesverfassungsgericht hat durch einstweilige Anordnung vom 14. Juli 2020 die Erklärung der Zulässigkeit der Vollstreckung einer in Italien gegen den Beschwerdeführer ergangenen Freiheitsstrafe durch den Beschluss des Landgerichts Essen vom 17. Januar 2019 - I StVK 1900/17 -, bestätigt durch den Beschluss des Oberlandesgerichts Hamm vom 23. Januar 2020 - III - 2 Ws 45/19 -, bis zur Entscheidung über die Verfassungsbeschwerde des Beschwerdeführers in der Hauptsache ausgesetzt.

Das Bundesverfassungsgericht kann eine einstweilige Anordnung dann wiederholen, wenn die gesetzlichen Voraussetzungen für den erstmaligen Erlass einer solchen Anordnung noch gegeben sind (vgl. BVerfGE 21, 50; 89, 113 ; 97, 102 ). Dies ist vorliegend der Fall. Zur Begründung wird auf den Beschluss vom 14. Juli 2020 verwiesen.