Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
2 BvR 739/17 ECLI:DE:BVerfG:2020:rs20201201.2bvr073917 Generato dall'IA

Object value determination for attorney fee reimbursement in constitutional complaints

Numero d'incarto 2 BvR 739/17
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Germania (DE)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Accolto (Allowed)
Spese processuali a carico dell'autorità / Stato
Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

In this constitutional complaint, the German Federal Constitutional Court ordered the Federal Republic of Germany to reimburse the complainant's necessary legal costs for both the main proceedings and the interim relief application. The dispute concerned a constitutional complaint, with the court explicitly determining the object value (Gegenstandswert) for the attorney's fees, setting it at €250,000 for the main proceedings and €125,000 for the application for a provisional order. The decisive legal basis for this cost determination and reimbursement was § 37(2), § 14(1), and § 22(1) of the Federal Lawyers' Fees Act (RVG).

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

§ 22 Abs. 1 RVG, § 37 Abs. 2, § 14 Abs. 1, § 22 Abs. 1 RVG; Object value determination for attorney fee reimbursement in constitutional complaints: The dispute concerned a constitutional complaint, with the court explicitly determining the object value (Gegenstandswert) for the attorney's fees, setting it at €250,000 for the main proceedings and €125,000 for the application for a provisional order. The decisive legal basis for this cost determination and reimbursement was § 37(2), § 14(1), and § 22(1) of the Federal Lawyers' Fees Act (RVG).

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
spese legali rimborso delle spese valore litigioso ricorso costituzionale all'estero indennità per il danno soggettivo procedimento sommario

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
§ 22 Abs. 1 RVG
§ 37 Abs. 2, § 14 Abs. 1, § 22 Abs. 1 RVG
Cited in the dispositive as the legal basis for determining the object value for attorney fees for the main proceedings and the application for a provisional order.
Generato dall'IA
2 BvR 987/16
Determination of the object value for attorney fees in constitutional complaint proceedings
1 BvR 2884/18
Valuation of constitutional complaint proceedings for attorney fee calculation under RVG § 37
1 BvR 3425/08
Valuation of attorney fees in constitutional complaint proceedings under §§ 37, 14 RVG
2 BvR 758/07
Constitutional complaint proceedings: Determination of matter value for attorney's fees under § 37 Abs. 2 Satz 2 RVG
2 BvR 491/09
Valuation of subject matter value for attorney fees in constitutional complaint proceedings

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
§ 37 Abs. 2, § 14 Abs. 1, § 22 Abs. 1 RVG

Cited in the dispositive as the legal basis for determining the object value for attorney fees for the main proceedings and the application for a provisional order.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Anordnung der Auslagenerstattung auch für das Eilverfahren - Gegenstandswertfestsetzung

[TENOR]

Die Bundesrepublik Deutschland hat dem Beschwerdeführer seine notwendigen Auslagen sowohl für das Hauptsacheverfahren als auch für den Antrag auf Erlass einer einstweiligen Anordnung zu erstatten.

Der Wert des Gegenstandes der anwaltlichen Tätigkeit des Beschwerdeführers wird für das Hauptsacheverfahren auf 250.000 Euro (in Worten: zweihundertfünfzigtausend Euro) und für den Antrag auf Erlass auf eine einstweilige Anordnung auf 125.000 Euro (in Worten: einhundertfünfundzwanzigtausend Euro) festgesetzt (§ 37 Abs. 2, § 14 Abs. 1, § 22 Abs. 1 RVG).