Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
2 BvR 2061/19 ECLI:DE:BVerfG:2020:rk20201126.2bvr206119 Generato dall'IA

Repetition of interim suspension of custodial sentence execution during pending constitutional review

Numero d'incarto 2 BvR 2061/19
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Germania (DE)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Accolto (Allowed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Federal Constitutional Court (Second Senate, First Chamber) ordered the repetition of a temporary injunction for a sixth month, thereby maintaining the preliminary suspension of the execution of the applicant’s custodial sentence until a final decision on the constitutional complaint is rendered. The dispute concerned the enforceability of a custodial sentence imposed by the Essen Regional Court in 2017, which had previously been stayed by the Federal Court of Justice and then subject to constitutional review. The Court based its decision on § 32(6) Sentence 2 of the Rules of Procedure for the Federal Constitutional Court (BVerfGG), finding that the statutory prerequisites for the original injunction—originally issued in December 2019—remained fulfilled, thus allowing the continuation of the stay without requiring new substantive findings.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

§ 32 Abs. 6 Satz 2 BVerfGG; Repetition of interim suspension of custodial sentence execution during pending constitutional review: The dispute concerned the enforceability of a custodial sentence imposed by the Essen Regional Court in 2017, which had previously been stayed by the Federal Court of Justice and then subject to constitutional review. The Court based its decision on § 32(6) Sentence 2 of the Rules of Procedure for the Federal Constitutional Court (BVerfGG), finding that the statutory prerequisites for the original injunction—originally issued in December 2019—remained fulfilled, thus allowing the continuation of the stay without requiring new substantive findings.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
differimento dell'esecuzione della pena pena privativa della libertà sospensione provvisionale misura cautelare controllo periodico della detenzione decisione pregiudiziale

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
§ 32 Abs. 6 Satz 2 BVerfGG
Procedural basis cited in the dispositive for repeating the temporary injunction for a further period.

Giurisprudenza citata

Generato dall'IA
4 StR 561/17
Criminal breach of trust via fraudulently inflated consulting fees and fictitious invoices violating statutory duties of economic efficiency
BVerfGE 21, 50
BVerfGE 21, 50; 89, 113 ; 97, 102 ).
Generato dall'IA
2 BvR 829/24
Repetition of interim order suspending execution of custodial sentence pending constitutional complaint
2 BvR 2628/10
Repetition of interim suspension of custodial sentence execution

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
§ 32 Abs. 6 Satz 2 BVerfGG

Procedural basis cited in the dispositive for repeating the temporary injunction for a further period.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Zweite Wiederholung einer einstweiligen Anordnung: Vorläufige Aussetzung der Vollstreckung einer Freiheitsstrafe

[TENOR]

Die einstweilige Anordnung vom 10. Dezember 2019, wiederholt mit Beschluss vom 3. Juni 2020, wird bis zu einer Entscheidung über die Verfassungsbeschwerde, längstens für die Dauer von sechs Monaten, wiederholt (§ 32 Abs. 6 Satz 2 BVerfGG).

[GRUENDE]

I. Das Bundesverfassungsgericht hat durch einstweilige Anordnung vom 10. Dezember 2019 die Vollstreckung der Freiheitsstrafe des Beschwerdeführers aus dem Urteil des Landgerichts Essen vom 8. Juni 2017 - 32 KLs 6/16 - nach Maßgabe des Beschlusses des Bundesgerichtshofs vom 20. Juni 2018 - 4 StR 561/17 - bis zur Entscheidung über die Verfassungsbeschwerde des Beschwerdeführers in der Hauptsache ausgesetzt und die einstweilige Anordnung mit Beschluss vom 3. Juni 2020 wiederholt.

II. Das Bundesverfassungsgericht kann eine einstweilige Anordnung dann wiederholen, wenn die gesetzlichen Voraussetzungen für den erstmaligen Erlass einer solchen Anordnung noch gegeben sind (vgl. BVerfGE 21, 50; 89, 113 ; 97, 102 ). Dies ist vorliegend der Fall. Zur Begründung wird auf den Beschluss vom 10. Dezember 2019 verwiesen.