Inadmissibility of constitutional complaint due to ungrounded recusal request not directed at specific chamber member

The Federal Constitutional Court dismissed the constitutional complaint as inadmissible and rejected the motion for recusal, leaving the challenged lower court proceedings in force. The case involved a challenge to a procedural decision where the petitioner filed a request for the recusal of a judge. The court determined that the recusal motion was procedurally defective and irrelevant to the specific instance at hand because it failed to provide the mandatory legal reasoning and did not pertain to a member of the reviewing panel, thereby violating the requirements for a valid recusal request under § 19 Abs. 2 Satz 1 BVerfGG. Consequently, the court exercised its discretion under § 93d Abs. 1 Satz 3 BVerfGG to omit further detailed reasoning, rendering the decision final and unappealable.