Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
1 BvR 110/20 ECLI:DE:BVerfG:2020:rk20201018.1bvr011020 Generato dall'IA

Retroactivity of social insurance security legislation and binding force on non-unionized employers

Numero d'incarto 1 BvR 110/20
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Germania (DE)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Inammissibile (Inadmissible)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Federal Constitutional Court rejected the constitutional complaint without referral, ruling that the complainant’s arguments failed on the merits. The dispute concerned the retroactive application of the Social Insurance Security Act (*Sozialkassenverfahrenssicherungsgesetz*) and its binding effect on non-unionized employers. Relying on a parallel decision, the Court held that the retroactive legislation was permissible and that non-unionized employers were legally bound by the collective agreement adjustments, thereby upholding the contested legislative framework.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

§ 93d Abs. 1 Satz 3 BVerfGG; Retroactivity of social insurance security legislation and binding force on non-unionized employers: Die Verfassungsbeschwerde wird, unbeschadet der Frage der Wiedereinsetzung in den vorigen Stand, nicht zur Entscheidung angenommen.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
vertenza di assicurazione sociale legislazione in materia di sicurezza sociale retroattività decisione quadro atto non legislativo diritti sindacali

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
§ 93d Abs. 1 Satz 3 BVerfGG
Von einer weiteren Begründung wird nach § 93d Abs. 1 Satz 3 BVerfGG abgesehen.

Giurisprudenza citata

Generato dall'IA
1 BvR 2654/17
Retroactive statute replacing invalidated collective agreements in construction industry social schemes
Generato dall'IA
1 BvR 2393/08, 1 BvR 2580/08, 1 BvR 2606/08
Challenging social insurance integration levy; lack of direct self-implication and subsidiarity of constitutional complaint against social court review
1 BvR 2718/19, 1 BvR 2719/19
Retrospective application of Social Insurance Security Act (SokaSiG) in labor law; insufficient substantiation of right to legal hearing
B 12 KR 5/18 B
Retroactive insurance exemption in statutory social security via labor law "business practice" barred by legislative reservation
1 BvR 2674/17
Refusal to accept constitutional challenge to obsolete statutory interpretation of Union citizen social welfare entitlement.
3 AZR 558/10
Reduction of annual special payments for statutory pensioners: constitutional limits on retroactivity, equality, and the Alimentationsprinzip

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Nichtannahmebeschluss: Parallelentscheidung

[TENOR]

Die Verfassungsbeschwerde wird, unbeschadet der Frage der Wiedereinsetzung in den vorigen Stand, nicht zur Entscheidung angenommen.

[GRUENDE]

Unabhängig von den Anforderungen an ihre Zulässigkeit greifen die mit der Verfassungsbeschwerde erhobenen Rügen in der Sache jedenfalls nicht durch. Insoweit wird auf den Beschluss der Kammer vom 11. August 2020 - 1 BvR 2654/17 - (Rn. 19 ff. zur zulässigen Rückwirkung des Sozialkassenverfahrenssicherungsgesetzes; Rn. 33 f. zur Bindung von nicht tarifgebundenen Arbeitgebern) verwiesen.

Von einer weiteren Begründung wird nach § 93d Abs. 1 Satz 3 BVerfGG abgesehen.

Diese Entscheidung ist unanfechtbar.