Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
1 BvR 2821/16 ECLI:DE:BVerfG:2020:rs20200415.1bvr282116 Generato dall'IA

Constitutional challenge to mandatory communications data retention under the VerkdHSpFruSpPflEG

Numero d'incarto 1 BvR 2821/16
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Germania (DE)
Data della decisione
Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Federal Constitutional Court ordered the separation of constitutional complaints filed by specific applicants from Case 1 BvR 2821/16 and their subsequent consolidation into Case 2 BvR 702/20 for further proceedings. This procedural decision concerns challenges to the constitutionality of Articles 5 and 1(9) of the Act on Introducing a Retention Obligation and a Maximum Retention Period for Communications Data (VerkdHSpFruSpPflEG). The key legal issue is the compatibility of mandatory data retention provisions with constitutional guarantees, specifically the right to information and data self-determination, without rendering a substantive judgment on the merits in this interlocutory order.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Constitutional challenge to mandatory communications data retention under the VerkdHSpFruSpPflEG: Von dem Verfahren 1 BvR 2821/16 werden die durch die Beschwerdeführer zu 4., 6. und 7. erhobenen Verfassungsbeschwerden abgetrennt. Sie werden fortan verbunden unter dem Aktenzeichen 2 BvR 702/20 fortgeführt.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
diritto di ritenzione costituzionalità diritti procedurali separazione dei coniugi decisione incidentale sfera privata

Giurisprudenza citata

Generato dall'IA
2 BvR 702/20
Sie werden fortan verbunden unter dem Aktenzeichen 2 BvR 702/20 fortgeführt.
Generato dall'IA
1 BvR 229/16
Constitutional challenge to telecommunications data retention: balancing fundamental privacy rights against criminal investigation needs in interim relief proceedings
1 BvR 141/16
Constitutional complaint over indiscriminate data retention: lack of interest in protection after CJEU ruling on EU incompatibility
1 BvQ 55/15
Interim relief against mandatory telecom data retention: balance of disadvantages under § 32 BVerfGG

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Abtrennung von Verfahren im Verfassungbeschwerdeverfahren bzgl der Verfassungsmäßigkeit von Art 5, Art 1 Nr 9 des Gesetzes zur Einführung einer Speicherpflicht und einer Höchstspeicherfrist für Verkehrsdaten (juris: VerkdHSpFruSpPflEG)

[TENOR]

Von dem Verfahren 1 BvR 2821/16 werden die durch die Beschwerdeführer zu 4., 6. und 7. erhobenen Verfassungsbeschwerden abgetrennt. Sie werden fortan verbunden unter dem Aktenzeichen 2 BvR 702/20 fortgeführt.