Parallel constitutional complaint dismissed by reference to identical case
Sintesi Legislator
Generato dall'IAThe Federal Constitutional Court refused to accept the constitutional complaint for a decision, thereby dismissing the applicant's challenge and rendering the request for interim relief moot. This non-acceptance decision addressed a constitutional complaint lodged in a parallel proceeding to case 2 BvR 483/20, without specifying the underlying substantive subject matter in the provided text. The court explicitly referred to the decision in the identical parallel case for the full legal reasoning and waived further justification under § 93d(1) sentence 3 of the Federal Constitutional Court Act, noting that the decision is final and unappealable.
Regesto Legislator
Generato dall'IA§ 93d Abs. 1 Satz 3 BVerfGG; Parallel constitutional complaint dismissed by reference to identical case: This non-acceptance decision addressed a constitutional complaint lodged in a parallel proceeding to case 2 BvR 483/20, without specifying the underlying substantive subject matter in the provided text. The court explicitly referred to the decision in the identical parallel case for the full legal reasoning and waived further justification under § 93d(1) sentence 3 of the Federal Constitutional Court Act, noting that the decision is final and unappealable.
Parole chiave
Generato dall'IADisposizioni normative citate
Generato dall'IAGiurisprudenza citata
Generato dall'IADecisioni correlate
Generato dall'IAQuestioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator
Generato dall'IAProcedural basis cited in the dispositive to justify the court's omission of further reasoning by referring to the decision in a parallel case.
Testo completo
Nichtannahmebeschluss: Parallelentscheidung
[TENOR] Die Verfassungsbeschwerde wird nicht zur Entscheidung angenommen.
Damit erledigt sich der Antrag auf Erlass einer einstweiligen Anordnung.
[GRUENDE]
Zur Begründung wird auf die Entscheidung im gleichgelagerten Verfahren 2 BvR 483/20 verwiesen.
Von einer weiteren Begründung wird nach § 93d Abs. 1 Satz 3 BVerfGG abgesehen.
Diese Entscheidung ist unanfechtbar.