Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
1 BvR 207/19 ECLI:DE:BVerfG:2020:rk20200206.1bvr020719 Generato dall'IA

Constitutional admissibility barred by loss of legal interest after identical academic freedom norms confirmed compatible with Basic Law

Numero d'incarto 1 BvR 207/19
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Germania (DE)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Inammissibile (Inadmissible)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Federal Constitutional Court declined to hear the constitutional complaint, resulting in the complainant's failure to obtain review. The dispute concerned the organizational regulations of the dual university system in Baden-Württemberg, specifically challenging the compatibility of certain norms with academic freedom. The Court held that the complaint lacked admissibility due to the absence of a continued need for legal protection, as a parallel constitutional complaint regarding substantively identical norms had recently confirmed their compatibility with Article 5, Paragraph 3, Sentence 1 of the Basic Law.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

§ 93a Abs. 2 BVerfGG; Constitutional admissibility barred by loss of legal interest after identical academic freedom norms confirmed compatible with Basic Law: The dispute concerned the organizational regulations of the dual university system in Baden-Württemberg, specifically challenging the compatibility of certain norms with academic freedom. The Court held that the complaint lacked admissibility due to the absence of a continued need for legal protection, as a parallel constitutional complaint regarding substantively identical norms had recently confirmed their compatibility with Article 5, Paragraph 3, Sentence 1 of the Basic Law.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
libertà di insegnamento perdita dell'interesse giuridico ordinamenti giuridici tutela legale fallimento accademico definitivo protezione delle libertà

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
§ 93a Abs. 2 BVerfGG
Procedural provision cited in the dispositive to justify the decision not to admit the constitutional complaint for further consideration.

Giurisprudenza citata

Generato dall'IA
1 BvR 1586/14
Dual university governance structures and the balancing of executive competencies with academic self-administration under the right to academic freedom
BVerfGE 33, 247
Es besteht kein Rechtschutzbedürfnis mehr (zum Zeitpunkt BVerfGE 33, 247 ; 50, 244 ), weil in einem weiteren, auch im Vorbringen weithin inhaltsgleichen Verfahren zur Hochschulorganisation der DHBW die Vereinbarkeit der auch hier angegriffenen Normen mit Art.
Generato dall'IA
1 BvR 1586/14
Dual university governance structures and the balancing of executive competencies with academic self-administration under the right to academic freedom
6 B 44/11, 6 B 44/11 (6 C 9/12)
Revocation of academic degree: constitutional limits of "unworthy conduct" under academic freedom and proportionality principles
1 BvR 1501/13, 1 BvR 1682/13
Constitutional limits on ministerially appointed transitional university leadership during statutory fusion
1 BvR 2218/13
Limits of judicial congruence requirement between university and state examinations under academic freedom

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
§ 93a Abs. 2 BVerfGG

Procedural provision cited in the dispositive to justify the decision not to admit the constitutional complaint for further consideration.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Nichtannahmebeschluss: Wegfall des Rechtsschutzinteresses mit Klärung der verfassungrechtlichen Fragen in weitgehend inhaltsgleichem Verfahren (hier: 1 BvR 1586/14)

[TENOR]

Die Verfassungsbeschwerde wird nicht zur Entscheidung angenommen.

[GRUENDE]

Der Beschwerdeführer wendet sich gegen Regelungen zur Organisation der Dualen Hochschule Baden-Württemberg (DHBW). Die Verfassungsbeschwerde ist nicht zur Entscheidung anzunehmen (§ 93a Abs. 2 BVerfGG). Es besteht kein Rechtschutzbedürfnis mehr (zum Zeitpunkt BVerfGE 33, 247 ; 50, 244 ), weil in einem weiteren, auch im Vorbringen weithin inhaltsgleichen Verfahren zur Hochschulorganisation der DHBW die Vereinbarkeit der auch hier angegriffenen Normen mit Art. 5 Abs. 3 Satz 1 GG festgestellt worden ist (BVerfG, Beschluss der 3. Kammer des Ersten Senats vom 5. Februar 2020 - 1 BvR 1586/14 -).

Diese Entscheidung ist unanfechtbar.