Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
1 BvR 2896/17 ECLI:DE:BVerfG:2020:rk20200212.1bvr289617 Generato dall'IA

Correction of scrivener's error in constitutional complaint non-acceptance order under § 118 VwGO and § 319 ZPO

Numero d'incarto 1 BvR 2896/17
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Germania (DE)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Respinto (Dismissed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Federal Constitutional Court ordered a correction to the operative part (Tenor) of its prior non-acceptance decision dated January 29, 2018, effectively upholding the original non-acceptance of the constitutional complaint while fixing a drafting error. The dispute arose from a scrivener's error in the referenced provision, where "Satz 3" (Sentence 3) was erroneously cited instead of "Satz 4" (Sentence 4) on page 2, line 8 of the original order. Relying on the corresponding application of § 118(1) of the Code of Administrative Court Procedure (VwGO) and § 319(1) of the Code of Civil Procedure (ZPO), the Court authorized the correction after hearing the complainant, with the amended decision being final and unappealable.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

§ 118 Abs. 1 VwGO, § 319 Abs. 1 ZPO; Correction of scrivener's error in constitutional complaint non-acceptance order under § 118 VwGO and § 319 ZPO: The dispute arose from a scrivener's error in the referenced provision, where "Satz 3" (Sentence 3) was erroneously cited instead of "Satz 4" (Sentence 4) on page 2, line 8 of the original order. Relying on the corresponding application of § 118(1) of the Code of Administrative Court Procedure (VwGO) and § 319(1) of the Code of Civil Procedure (ZPO), the Court authorized the correction after hearing the complainant, with the amended decision being final and unappealable.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
errore amministrativo vertenza non amministrativa dispositivo codice di diritto processuale civile censura di violazione costituzionale revisione di una decisione

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
§ 118 Abs. 1 VwGO
Procedural rule applied in the dispositive to authorize the correction of a writing error in the operative part of the previous decision.
§ 319 Abs. 1 ZPO
Procedural rule applied in the dispositive, in corresponding application, to authorize the correction of a writing error in the operative part of the previous decision.
Generato dall'IA
2 BvR 1550/17
Correction of clerical errors in the reasoning of a non-acceptance decision
1 BvR 2485/12
Correction of a clerical error in a prior chamber decision replacing an incorrect Federal Administrative Court case number
1 BvR 1655/21
Correction of clerical error in prior chamber decision
1 BvR 125/22
Corrections to apparent clerical errors in a prior judicial decision
2 BvR 1057/22
Ex officio correction of factual inaccuracy in prior favorable chamber decision regarding non-executed procedural order

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
§ 118 Abs. 1 VwGO

Procedural rule applied in the dispositive to authorize the correction of a writing error in the operative part of the previous decision.

§ 319 Abs. 1 ZPO

Procedural rule applied in the dispositive, in corresponding application, to authorize the correction of a writing error in the operative part of the previous decision.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Berichtigung eines Schreibversehens im Tenor eines Nichtannahmebeschlusses

[TENOR]

Der Beschluss über die Nichtannahme der Verfassungsbeschwerde vom 29. Januar 2018 wird nach Anhörung der Beschwerdeführerin in entsprechender Anwendung von § 118 Abs. 1 VwGO und § 319 Abs. 1 ZPO dahingehend berichtigt, dass auf Seite 2 in Zeile 8 die Worte "Satz 3" durch die Worte "Satz 4" ersetzt werden.

[GRUENDE]

Diese Entscheidung ist unanfechtbar.