Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
1 BvR 1800/19 ECLI:DE:BVerfG:2019:rk20191001.1bvr180019 Generato dall'IA

Constitutional complaint against parallel judicial decision; admissibility and dismissal of application for provisional injunction

Numero d'incarto 1 BvR 1800/19
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Germania (DE)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Inammissibile (Inadmissible)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Federal Constitutional Court (First Senate, First Chamber) declined to admit the constitutional complaint for a decision, thereby rendering the application for a provisional injunction moot, with no further reasoning provided. The case involved a constitutional complaint against a prior decision issued as a "parallel decision," challenging the underlying judicial act or its procedural handling. The operative outcome is based on the chamber's discretion not to accept the complaint for decision under § 93d (1) sentence 3 of the Rules of Procedure of the Federal Constitutional Court (BVerfGG), establishing that the challenged lower court or administrative action remains in force.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

§ 93d Abs. 1 Satz 3 BVerfGG, § 40 Abs. 3 GOBVerfG; Constitutional complaint against parallel judicial decision; admissibility and dismissal of application for provisional injunction: The case involved a constitutional complaint against a prior decision issued as a "parallel decision," challenging the underlying judicial act or its procedural handling. The operative outcome is based on the chamber's discretion not to accept the complaint for decision under § 93d (1) sentence 3 of the Rules of Procedure of the Federal Constitutional Court (BVerfGG), establishing that the challenged lower court or administrative action remains in force.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
potere d'apprezzamento del giudice ricorso costituzionale all'estero questioni processuali reclamo amministrativo proroga di competenza procedimento pregiudiziale d'urgenza

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
§ 93d Abs. 1 Satz 3 BVerfGG
Von einer Begründung im Übrigen wird nach § 93d Abs. 1 Satz 3 BVerfGG abgesehen.
§ 40 Abs. 3 GOBVerfG
Cited in the dispositive to declare the application for a provisional injunction moot as a consequence of the constitutional complaint not being admitted.
Generato dall'IA
1 BvR 1799/19
Constitutional complaint non-acceptance rendering interim relief moot in parallel decision context
1 BvR 443/16
Constitutional complaint dismissed without reasons under § 93d BVerfGG, rendering interim relief application moot
2 BvR 126/15
Constitutional complaint regarding the rejection of a motion for provisional measures
1 BvR 2060/15
Constitutional complaint against a parallel decision (Parallelentscheidung) refused for lack of acceptability
1 BvR 1819/15
Constitutional complaint against a parallel court decision declared inadmissible

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
§ 40 Abs. 3 GOBVerfG

Cited in the dispositive to declare the application for a provisional injunction moot as a consequence of the constitutional complaint not being admitted.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Kammerbeschluss ohne Begründung: Parallelentscheidung

[TENOR]

1. Die Verfassungsbeschwerde wird nicht zur Entscheidung angenommen.

2. Mit der Nichtannahme der Verfassungsbeschwerde wird der Antrag auf Erlass einer einstweiligen Anordnung gegenstandslos (§ 40 Abs. 3 GOBVerfG).

[GRUENDE]

Von einer Begründung im Übrigen wird nach § 93d Abs. 1 Satz 3 BVerfGG abgesehen.

Diese Entscheidung ist unanfechtbar.