Constitutional complaint against administrative diesel ban rejected as unreasoned non-acceptance
Sintesi Legislator
Generato dall'IAThe First Chamber of the First Senate of the German Federal Constitutional Court declined to accept a constitutional complaint for adjudication and rendered the associated application for interim relief moot. The complainant had challenged, directly and indirectly under § 40 Abs. 1 S 1 BImschG, an administrative court decision related to a "diesel ban" (Dieselfahrverbot). The court issued an unreasoned chamber decision pursuant to § 93d Abs. 1 S 3 BVerfGG, thereby leaving the underlying administrative and judicial decisions in force.
Regesto Legislator
Generato dall'IA§ 93d Abs. 1 Satz 3 BVerfGG, § 40 Abs. 3 GOBVerfG; Constitutional complaint against administrative diesel ban rejected as unreasoned non-acceptance: The complainant had challenged, directly and indirectly under § 40 Abs. 1 S 1 BImschG, an administrative court decision related to a "diesel ban" (Dieselfahrverbot). The court issued an unreasoned chamber decision pursuant to § 93d Abs. 1 S 3 BVerfGG, thereby leaving the underlying administrative and judicial decisions in force.
Parole chiave
Generato dall'IADisposizioni normative citate
Generato dall'IADecisioni correlate
Generato dall'IAQuestioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator
Generato dall'IACited in the second order to declare the application for interim relief moot following the non-acceptance of the constitutional complaint.
Testo completo
Kammerbeschluss ohne Begründung: Nichtannahme einer unmittelbar gegen verwaltungsgerichtliche Entscheidung zu einem "Dieselfahrverbot" sowie mittelbar gegen § 40 Abs 1 S 1 BImschG gerichteten Verfassungsbeschwerde
[TENOR]
1. Die Verfassungsbeschwerde wird nicht zur Entscheidung angenommen.
2. Mit der Nichtannahme der Verfassungsbeschwerde wird der Antrag auf Erlass einer einstweiligen Anordnung gegenstandslos (§ 40 Abs. 3 GOBVerfG).
[GRUENDE]
Von einer Begründung im Übrigen wird nach § 93d Abs. 1 Satz 3 BVerfGG abgesehen.
Diese Entscheidung ist unanfechtbar.