Constitutional complaint against refusal of deadline reinstatement; dispensation from statement of reasons under § 93d BVerfGG
Germania (DE)
Sintesi Legislator
Generato dall'IAThe Federal Constitutional Court refused to accept the constitutional complaint for a decision without entering into the merits of the accompanying motion for reinstatement of the deadline, rendering the decision unchallengeable. The case involved a procedural constitutional complaint where the complainant challenged a lower court’s procedural handling, specifically seeking relief from a missed deadline through a motion for reinstatement. The Court applied § 93d(1) sentence 3 of the Federal Constitutional Court Act (BVerfGG) to dispense with a written statement of reasons, thereby denying the relief sought by the applicant.
Regesto Legislator
Generato dall'IA§ 93d Abs. 1 Satz 3 BVerfGG; Constitutional complaint against refusal of deadline reinstatement; dispensation from statement of reasons under § 93d BVerfGG: The case involved a procedural constitutional complaint where the complainant challenged a lower court’s procedural handling, specifically seeking relief from a missed deadline through a motion for reinstatement. The Court applied § 93d(1) sentence 3 of the Federal Constitutional Court Act (BVerfGG) to dispense with a written statement of reasons, thereby denying the relief sought by the applicant.
Parole chiave
Generato dall'IADisposizioni normative citate
Generato dall'IADecisioni correlate
Generato dall'IAQuestioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator
Generato dall'IAProcedural rule explicitly cited in the dispositive to justify the omission of a written statement of reasons for the refusal to accept the constitutional complaint.
Testo completo
Nichtannahmebeschluss ohne Begründung
[TENOR]
Die Verfassungsbeschwerde wird nicht zur Entscheidung angenommen, ohne dass es auf den Wiedereinsetzungsantrag ankäme.
Von einer Begründung wird nach § 93d Abs. 1 Satz 3 BVerfGG abgesehen.
[GRUENDE]
Diese Entscheidung ist unanfechtbar.