Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
2 BvC 18/19 ECLI:DE:BVerfG:2019:cs20190725.2bvc001819 Generato dall'IA

Election validity challenge rejected for lack of reasoning; blanket recusal of entire Senate panel deemed inadmissible

Numero d'incarto 2 BvC 18/19
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Germania (DE)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Inammissibile (Inadmissible)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Federal Constitutional Court dismissed an election review complaint and rejected a motion to recuse all judges of the Second Senate as inadmissible, leaving the challenged legislative election result in force. The respondent challenged the validity of an election, prompting a filing that sought the recusal of the entire panel, which the Court treated as a procedural prerequisite. Citing Section 24, Sentence 2, of the Federal Constitutional Court Act (BVerfGG), the Court declined to provide further reasoning, relying on the rationale set forth in a prior report by the rapporteur.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

§ 24 Satz 2 BVerfGG; Election validity challenge rejected for lack of reasoning; blanket recusal of entire Senate panel deemed inadmissible: The respondent challenged the validity of an election, prompting a filing that sought the recusal of the entire panel, which the Court treated as a procedural prerequisite. Citing Section 24, Sentence 2, of the Federal Constitutional Court Act (BVerfGG), the Court declined to provide further reasoning, relying on the rationale set forth in a prior report by the rapporteur.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
validità delle elezioni domanda di ricusazione controllo della procedura motivazione inadeguata delle censure costituzionali tacita revoca dell'opposizione diritto al riconteggio

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
§ 24 Satz 2 BVerfGG
Cited in the dispositive to justify the omission of further reasoning and the reliance on the report of the rapporteur for the dismissal of the complaint.
Generato dall'IA
2 BvC 8/24
Rejection of judicial recusal motion and election challenge due to lack of substantiated impartiality grounds
2 BvC 3/18
Election scrutiny complaint; inadmissibility of recusal motion for unlisted judges and defective bias justification
2 BvC 58/14
Election results challenge dismissed without substantive justification under constitutional election review procedure
2 BvC 24/23
Election review rejection by reference and rejection of a recusal motion based on substantively unsupported grounds
2 BvC 55/19
Election Review Dismissal and Recusal Rejection: Insufficiency of Preliminary Judicial Opinions and Political Affiliation as Grounds for Bias

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
§ 24 Satz 2 BVerfGG

Cited in the dispositive to justify the omission of further reasoning and the reliance on the report of the rapporteur for the dismissal of the complaint.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Verwerfung (a-limine-Abweisung) einer Wahlprüfungsbeschwerde unter Hinweis auf das Berichterstatterschreiben - Verwerfung eines gegen sämtliche Richter des Senats gerichteten Ablehnungsgesuchs

[TENOR]

Das Ablehnungsgesuch gegen sämtliche Richter des Zweiten Senats wird als unzulässig verworfen.

Die Wahlprüfungsbeschwerde wird verworfen.

[GRUENDE]

Dem Ablehnungsgesuch und der Wahlprüfungsbeschwerde bleiben aus den in dem Schreiben des Berichterstatters vom 5. Juni 2019 genannten Gründen der Erfolg versagt. Gemäß § 24 Satz 2 BVerfGG wird von einer weiteren Begründung abgesehen.