Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
2 BvR 517/19 ECLI:DE:BVerfG:2019:rk20190926.2bvr051719 Generato dall'IA

Surrender to Russia for criminal prosecution; repetition of interim measure suspending extradition

Numero d'incarto 2 BvR 517/19
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Germania (DE)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Accolto (Allowed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The German Federal Constitutional Court ordered the repetition of its previous interim measure, suspending the surrender of a Russian national to the authorities of the Russian Federation for criminal prosecution for a further period of six months or until a final decision on the constitutional complaint, thereby prevailing for the complainant. This decision arose from a constitutional complaint challenging the enforcement of an extradition or surrender request, where the applicant sought to prevent transfer to the requested state pending the court's review of the underlying constitutional rights. The Court held that the statutory prerequisites for issuing the initial interim order remained fulfilled, citing established case law on the conditions for renewing interim measures under § 32 Abs. 6 Satz 2 of the Federal Constitutional Court Act (BVerfGG).

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

§ 32 Abs. 6 Satz 2 BVerfGG; Surrender to Russia for criminal prosecution; repetition of interim measure suspending extradition: This decision arose from a constitutional complaint challenging the enforcement of an extradition or surrender request, where the applicant sought to prevent transfer to the requested state pending the court's review of the underlying constitutional rights. The Court held that the statutory prerequisites for issuing the initial interim order remained fulfilled, citing established case law on the conditions for renewing interim measures under § 32 Abs. 6 Satz 2 of the Federal Constitutional Court Act (BVerfGG).

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
estradizione misura cautelare diritto di rimanere denuncia penale Stato federato misure d'esecuzione forzata

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
§ 32 Abs. 6 Satz 2 BVerfGG
Procedural basis for the repetition of the interim measure suspending the surrender.

Giurisprudenza citata

Generato dall'IA
BVerfGE 21, 50
BVerfGE 21, 50; 89, 113 ; 97, 102 ).
Generato dall'IA
2 BvR 351/19
Interim suspension of extradition to Russia for criminal prosecution pending constitutional review
2 BvR 1282/21
Interim prohibition of extradition to Russia based on unassessed risk of political persecution and inadequate evaluation of detention conditions
2 BvQ 86/17
Interim suspension of extradition to Russia: substantive substantiation of the underlying constitutional complaint as a prerequisite for provisional relief
2 BvR 2100/18
Repetition of interim order suspending surrender to Romania under § 32 BVerfGG

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
§ 32 Abs. 6 Satz 2 BVerfGG

Procedural basis for the repetition of the interim measure suspending the surrender.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Wiederholung einer einstweiligen Anordnung: Einstweilige Aussetzung der Auslieferung eines Russen an die Behörden der Russischen Föderation zur Strafverfolgung

[TENOR]

Die einstweilige Anordnung vom 3. April 2019 wird bis zu einer Entscheidung über die Verfassungsbeschwerde, längstens für die Dauer von sechs Monaten, wiederholt (§ 32 Abs. 6 Satz 2 BVerfGG).

[GRUENDE]

I. Das Bundesverfassungsgericht hat durch einstweilige Anordnung vom 3. April 2019 die Übergabe des Beschwerdeführers an die Behörden der Russischen Föderation bis zur Entscheidung über die Verfassungsbeschwerde, längstens für die Dauer von sechs Monaten, einstweilen ausgesetzt.

II. Das Bundesverfassungsgericht kann eine einstweilige Anordnung dann wiederholen, wenn die gesetzlichen Voraussetzungen für den erstmaligen Erlass einer solchen Anordnung noch gegeben sind (vgl. BVerfGE 21, 50; 89, 113 ; 97, 102 ). Dies ist vorliegend der Fall. Zur Begründung wird auf den Beschluss vom 3. April 2019 verwiesen.