Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
2 BvR 1165/19 ECLI:DE:BVerfG:2019:rk20190716.2bvr116519 Generato dall'IA

Interim relief in incarceration to compel prison administration's statements denied for partial anticipation of main proceedings

Numero d'incarto 2 BvR 1165/19
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Germania (DE)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Respinto (Dismissed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Federal Constitutional Court of Germany dismissed the application for interim relief filed by an incarcerated prisoner. The applicant sought an order compelling the responsible prison administration to provide specific information or explanations, but the Court ruled that such a measure would partially anticipate the main proceedings. Under § 32 (1) of the Federal Constitutional Court Act (BVerfGG), the Court determined that the applicant's interest did not sufficiently outweigh the negative consequences if the main constitutional complaint were to be unsuccessful later, applying a strict standard of review for interim orders.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Interim relief in incarceration to compel prison administration's statements denied for partial anticipation of main proceedings: The applicant sought an order compelling the responsible prison administration to provide specific information or explanations, but the Court ruled that such a measure would partially anticipate the main proceedings. Under § 32 (1) of the Federal Constitutional Court Act (BVerfGG), the Court determined that the applicant's interest did not sufficiently outweigh the negative consequences if the main constitutional complaint were to be unsuccessful later, applying a strict standard of review for interim orders.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
procedimento sommario amministrazione penitenziaria misure sostitutive della carcerazione sospensione condizionale della carcerazione sospensione del procedimento esecuzione delle pene

Giurisprudenza citata

Generato dall'IA
BVerfGE 93, 181
Generato dall'IA
2 BvQ 4/18
Interim relief refused for parole suspension due to non-exhaustion of ordinary appellate proceedings
2 BvQ 50/10
Interim relief in prison litigation rejected for insufficient identification of sovereign acts and exhausted legal remedies
2 BvQ 28/14
Interim relief on prison pocket money denied due to unexhausted main proceedings and lack of severe disadvantage
2 BvR 336/20
Interim relief for prison sentence suspension rejected due to failure to demonstrate severe disadvantage despite extended prison leave
2 BvQ 38/14
Denial of interim relief for lack of prior exhaustion of legal remedies and absence of severe disadvantage in prison disciplinary proceedings

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Ablehnung eines eA-Antrags mit Tenorbegründung: Verpflichtung der JVA zu Ausführungen des inhaftierten Antragstellers würde Hauptsache teilweise vorwegnehmen - Folgenabwägung zulasten des Antragstellers

[TENOR]

Der Antrag auf Erlass einer einstweiligen Anordnung wird abgelehnt. Nach § 32 Absatz 1 BVerfGG kann das Bundesverfassungsgericht im Streitfall einen Zustand durch einstweilige Anordnung vorläufig regeln, wenn dies zur Abwehr schwerer Nachteile, zur Verhinderung drohender Gewalt oder aus einem anderen wichtigen Grund zum gemeinen Wohl dringend geboten ist. Die Erfolgsaussichten der Verfassungsbeschwerde bleiben dabei außer Betracht. Bei Zugrundelegung des anwendbaren strikten Prüfungsmaßstabs (vgl. etwa BVerfGE 93, 181 ) überwiegt das Interesse des strafgefangenen Beschwerdeführers an dem Erlass einer die Justizvollzugsanstalt zu Ausführungen verpflichtenden einstweiligen Anordnung, mit welcher die Hauptsache zumindest teilweise vorweggenommen werden würde, nicht hinreichend die Folgen, die zu befürchten sind, wenn die begehrte einstweilige Anordnung erlassen würde, die Verfassungsbeschwerde aber später erfolglos bliebe.

[GRUENDE]

Diese Entscheidung ist unanfechtbar.