Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
1 BvR 981/17 ECLI:DE:BVerfG:2018:rs20180924.1bvr098117 Generato dall'IA

Determination of the amount in dispute in constitutional complaint proceedings based on subjective and objective significance

Numero d'incarto 1 BvR 981/17
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Germania (DE)
Data della decisione

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Federal Constitutional Court fixed the value of the subject matter of the legal practice in this constitutional complaint proceeding at €150,000, a determination influenced by the procedure's subjective and specific objective significance and the facilitation of the process by attorney activity. This decision addresses the procedural issue of "Gegenstandswertfestsetzung" (determination of the amount in dispute) within a constitutional complaint, serving to establish the financial scope for associated costs. The decisive legal basis relies on the assessment of subjective and special objective importance, consistent with the Court’s prior doctrine that such value determinations are adjusted to reflect the significance of the proceedings and the contribution of professional legal representation.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

BVerfGE 79, 365; Determination of the amount in dispute in constitutional complaint proceedings based on subjective and objective significance: This decision addresses the procedural issue of "Gegenstandswertfestsetzung" (determination of the amount in dispute) within a constitutional complaint, serving to establish the financial scope for associated costs. The decisive legal basis relies on the assessment of subjective and special objective importance, consistent with the Court’s prior doctrine that such value determinations are adjusted to reflect the significance of the proceedings and the contribution of professional legal representation.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
valore litigioso spese di procedura determinazione dei compensi dottrina giuridica motivazione inadeguata delle censure costituzionali esame della situazione economica

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
BVerfGE 79, 365
Cited in the operative order to justify the fixation of the value of the subject matter based on the subjective and objective significance of the proceedings and attorney activity.

Giurisprudenza citata

Generato dall'IA
BVerfGE 79, 365
BVerfGE 79, 365 ) wird der Wert des Gegenstands der anwaltlichen Tätigkeit für das Verfahren auf 150.000 € (in Worten: einhundertfünfzigtausend Euro) festgesetzt.
Generato dall'IA

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
BVerfGE 79, 365

Cited in the operative order to justify the fixation of the value of the subject matter based on the subjective and objective significance of the proceedings and attorney activity.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Gegenstandswertfestsetzung im Verfassungsbeschwerdeverfahren

[TENOR]

Unter Berücksichtigung der subjektiven und besonderen objektiven Bedeutung des Verfahrens und seiner Förderung durch die anwaltliche Tätigkeit (vgl. BVerfGE 79, 365 ) wird der Wert des Gegenstands der anwaltlichen Tätigkeit für das Verfahren auf 150.000 € (in Worten: einhundertfünfzigtausend Euro) festgesetzt.