Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
1 BvR 3155/13 ECLI:DE:BVerfG:2018:rk20180704.1bvr315513 Generato dall'IA

Part-time employment contract interpretation: Exceedance of permissible judicial lawmaking under § 14(2) TzBfG violating the right to a legally bound judge

Numero d'incarto 1 BvR 3155/13
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Germania (DE)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Accolto (Allowed)
Spese processuali a carico dell'autorità / Stato
Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Federal Constitutional Court (First Senate, Second Chamber) upheld the constitutional complaint, finding that the petitioner’s fundamental rights under Article 2(1) in conjunction with Article 20(3) of the German Basic Law were violated; consequently, the court set aside the decision of the Lower Labor Court of Nuremberg, remanded the case to that court for re-examination, and ordered the Federal State of Bavaria to reimburse the petitioner’s necessary expenses. The dispute concerned a labor law case where the lower courts had applied the Federal Labor Court’s established jurisprudence interpreting Section 14(2) sentence 2 of the Part-Time and Fixed-Term Work Act (TzBfG), which the Constitutional Court found to exceed the limits of tolerable interpretation and permissible judicial lawmaking. This ruling renders the prior Federal Labor Court decision on the non-acceptance of the appeal moot, based on the precedent that such statutory interpretation violates the constitutional right to a legally bound judge.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Art. 20 Abs. 3 GG; Part-time employment contract interpretation: Exceedance of permissible judicial lawmaking under § 14(2) TzBfG violating the right to a legally bound judge: The dispute concerned a labor law case where the lower courts had applied the Federal Labor Court’s established jurisprudence interpreting Section 14(2) sentence 2 of the Part-Time and Fixed-Term Work Act (TzBfG), which the Constitutional Court found to exceed the limits of tolerable interpretation and permissible judicial lawmaking. This ruling renders the prior Federal Labor Court decision on the non-acceptance of the appeal moot, based on the precedent that such statutory interpretation violates the constitutional right to a legally bound judge.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
diritto processuale interpretazione del contratto limiti costituzionali contratto di lavoro determinato lavoro a tempo parziale diritto al lavoro

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Art. 20 Abs. 3 GG
1 in Verbindung mit Art. 20 Abs. 3 GG verletzen.

Giurisprudenza citata

Generato dall'IA
7 AZR 716/09
Time limit for the prior employment prohibition in reason-less fixed-term contracts under § 14(2) sentence 2 TzBfG
BAGE 137, 275
April 2011 - 7 AZR 716/09 -, BAGE 137, 275 ; Urteil vom 21.
7 AZR 375/10
Validity of fixed-term employment contract without valid reason: exclusion of prior vocational training from the statutory prior employment ban
BAGE 139, 213
September 2011 - 7 AZR 375/10 -, BAGE 139, 213 ).
1 BvL 7/14
Unconstitutionality of judicially extended three-year cooling-off period for repeated factually unfounded fixed-term employment contracts
1 BvR 1375/14
Unconstitutionality of judicially extended three-year cooling-off period for repeated factually unfounded fixed-term employment contracts
Generato dall'IA
1 BvR 3043/13
Fixed-term contract interpretation under § 14 Abs. 2 TzBfG exceeding limits of permissible judicial law development
1 BvR 3436/13
Fixed-Term Employment Contract Validity Under § 14(2) TzBfG: Judicial Law-Making Exceeding Interpretive Limits
1 BvR 3044/13
Fixed-term employment termination: interpretation of § 14 Abs. 2 Satz 2 TzBfG as exceeding limits of permissible judicial law-making under Art. 2(1), Art. 20(3) GG
1 BvR 3058/13
Fixed-term employment contracts: Constitutional violation through judicial reinterpretation of § 14 TzBfG exceeding limits of permissible statutory interpretation
1 BvR 1097/14
Constitutional limits on judicial law-making: unconstitutional interpretation of fixed-term employment contract requirements under § 14(2) TzBfG violating the right to a lawful judge

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
Artikel 2 Absatz 1 in Verbindung mit Artikel 20 Absatz 3 des Grundgesetzes

The constitutional rights violated by the lower court decisions, serving as the main ground for granting the complaint and setting aside the judgment.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Stattgebender Kammerbeschluss: Parallelentscheidung

[TENOR]

1. Das Urteil des Landesarbeitsgerichts Nürnberg vom 8. Mai 2013 - 2 Sa 12/13 - und das Endurteil des Arbeitsgerichts Bamberg vom 10. Oktober 2012 - 2 Ca 1066/11 - verletzen den Beschwerdeführer in seinem Grundrecht aus Artikel 2 Absatz 1 in Verbindung mit Artikel 20 Absatz 3 des Grundgesetzes.

2. Das Urteil des Landesarbeitsgerichts Nürnberg vom 8. Mai 2013 - 2 Sa 12/13 - wird aufgehoben. Die Sache wird an das Landesarbeitsgericht Nürnberg zurückverwiesen. Damit wird der Beschluss des Bundesarbeitsgerichts vom 11. September 2013 - 7 AZN 658/13 - gegenstandslos.

3. Der Freistaat Bayern hat dem Beschwerdeführer seine notwendigen Auslagen zu erstatten.

[GRUENDE]

Die Verfassungsbeschwerde wird zur Entscheidung angenommen (§ 93c Abs. 1, § 93a Abs. 2 b BVerfGG). Sie hat Erfolg, weil die angegriffenen Entscheidungen den Beschwerdeführer in seinem Grundrecht aus Art. 2 Abs. 1 in Verbindung mit Art. 20 Abs. 3 GG verletzen. Die angegriffenen Entscheidungen beruhen auf der Rechtsprechung des Bundesarbeitsgerichts zur Auslegung von § 14 Abs. 2 Satz 2 TzBfG (vgl. dazu BAG, Urteil vom 6. April 2011 - 7 AZR 716/09 -, BAGE 137, 275 ; Urteil vom 21. September 2011 - 7 AZR 375/10 -, BAGE 139, 213 ). Nach dem Beschluss des Ersten Senats des Bundesverfassungsgerichts vom 6. Juni 2018 - 1 BvL 7/14, 1 BvR 1375/14 - überschreitet diese Rechtsprechung die Grenzen vertretbarer Auslegung und zulässiger richterlicher Rechtsfortbildung.

Diese Entscheidung ist unanfechtbar.