Inadmissibility of constitutional complaint for failure to submit necessary documents and insufficient engagement with the challenged decision

The Federal Constitutional Court declined to accept the constitutional complaint for decision, leaving the lower court's ruling in force. The dispute involved a procedural challenge where the complainants failed to submit the necessary documents for assessing the constitutionality of the attacked decision and did not sufficiently engage with the underlying legal situation or the specific rulings. The decisive legal basis for the operative outcome was the procedural inadmissibility of the complaint due to the lack of a sufficient explanation (*hinreichende Begründung*), in accordance with the standard requirements for admissibility under the Federal Constitutional Court Act.