Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
1 BvR 2792/17 ECLI:DE:BVerfG:2018:rk20180523.1bvr279217 Generato dall'IA

Eligibility of municipal umbrella association employees as lay judges in social assistance: employment does not establish exclusion under § 17 Abs. 3 SGG or bias

Numero d'incarto 1 BvR 2792/17
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Germania (DE)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Inammissibile (Inadmissible)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Federal Constitutional Court (1st Senate, 2nd Chamber) declined to accept the constitutional complaint for decision, leaving the challenged Federal Social Court ruling in force. The dispute concerned the eligibility of employees of municipal umbrella associations to serve as lay judges in social assistance cases, specifically whether their employment relationship constituted grounds for exclusion under § 17(3) SGG or raised concerns of bias under general bias doctrines. The Court determined that the prerequisites for admissibility under § 93a(2) BVerfGG were not met, as it found no compelling constitutional objections to the view that such employment alone does not automatically render lay judges excluded or biased in social assistance matters.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

§ 17 Abs 3 SGG, § 93a Abs. 2 BVerfGG, § 93d Abs. 1 Satz 3 BVerfGG; Eligibility of municipal umbrella association employees as lay judges in social assistance: employment does not establish exclusion under § 17 Abs. 3 SGG or bias: The dispute concerned the eligibility of employees of municipal umbrella associations to serve as lay judges in social assistance cases, specifically whether their employment relationship constituted grounds for exclusion under § 17(3) SGG or raised concerns of bias under general bias doctrines. The Court determined that the prerequisites for admissibility under § 93a(2) BVerfGG were not met, as it found no compelling constitutional objections to the view that such employment alone does not automatically render lay judges excluded or biased in social assistance matters.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
assistenza sociale cause di esclusione rapporto di lavoro oggetto della lite uguaglianza giuridica autorità preposta all'assistenza giudiziaria

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
§ 17 Abs 3 SGG
Nichtannahmebeschluss: Zur Mitwirkung Bediensteter kommunaler Spitzenverbände als ehrenamtliche Richter in Sozialhilfesachen - Beschäftigungsverhältnis begründet weder Ausschluss gem § 17 Abs 3 SGG noch ohne weiteres eine Besorgnis der Befangenheit
§ 93a Abs. 2 BVerfGG
Cited as the decisive procedural basis for the non-acceptance of the constitutional complaint for decision due to the absence of the required prerequisites.
§ 93d Abs. 1 Satz 3 BVerfGG
Cited in the dispositive to justify the omission of a further detailed legal reasoning.
Generato dall'IA
B 8 SO 10/16 R
Exclusion of municipal association employees from social welfare courts: No analogous extension of § 17 Abs 3 SGG to staff of federal municipal umbrella associations
B 1 SF 4/18 S
Lapse of eligibility for lay judge due to loss of employer association employment status
B 14 AS 102/15 B
Social assistance appeal decision by rapporteur without clear consent violating right to statutory judge
B 13 R 240/12 B
Statutory judge composition in social courts: invalid appeal decision by case reporter and lay judges without required senate transfer
5 C 1/15
Exclusion of humanitarian relief positions from disabled employment quota under SGB IX § 73 Abs. 2 Nr. 2

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
§ 93a Abs. 2 BVerfGG

Cited as the decisive procedural basis for the non-acceptance of the constitutional complaint for decision due to the absence of the required prerequisites.

§ 93d Abs. 1 Satz 3 BVerfGG

Cited in the dispositive to justify the omission of a further detailed legal reasoning.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Nichtannahmebeschluss: Zur Mitwirkung Bediensteter kommunaler Spitzenverbände als ehrenamtliche Richter in Sozialhilfesachen - Beschäftigungsverhältnis begründet weder Ausschluss gem § 17 Abs 3 SGG noch ohne weiteres eine Besorgnis der Befangenheit

[TENOR]

Die Verfassungsbeschwerde wird nicht zur Entscheidung angenommen.

[GRUENDE]

Das Bundessozialgericht hat in dem mit der Verfassungsbeschwerde angegriffenen Beschluss ehrenamtliche Richter in Sozialhilfesachen weder als ausgeschlossen nach § 17 Abs. 3 SGG noch als befangen beurteilt, allein weil sie Bedienstete kommunaler Spitzenverbände sind. Die allein hiergegen gerichtete Verfassungsbeschwerde wird nicht zur Entscheidung angenommen, weil die Voraussetzungen des § 93a Abs. 2 BVerfGG nicht vorliegen. Es begegnet keinen durchgreifenden verfassungsrechtlichen Bedenken, die Bediensteten kommunaler Spitzenverbände nur aufgrund ihres Beschäftigungsverhältnisses in Sozialhilfesachen nicht für befangen oder ausgeschlossen zu erachten.

Von einer weiteren Begründung wird nach § 93d Abs. 1 Satz 3 BVerfGG abgesehen.

Diese Entscheidung ist unanfechtbar.