Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
2 BvQ 26/18 ECLI:DE:BVerfG:2018:qk20180320.2bvq002618 Generato dall'IA

Interim relief under § 32 BVerfGG: Inadmissibility due to insufficient substantiation of prerequisites

Numero d'incarto 2 BvQ 26/18
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Germania (DE)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Inammissibile (Inadmissible)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The German Federal Constitutional Court dismissed a constitutional complaint for interim relief as inadmissible, ruling in favor of the respondent state authorities. The applicant sought a temporary injunction under Section 32 of the Federal Constitutional Court Act, but failed to provide the required sufficient substantiation of the prerequisites for such an order. The court emphasized that the applicant did not adequately demonstrate the imminent risk or specific harm necessary to justify the extraordinary procedural remedy, citing established case law on the strict substantiation standards for emergency relief. Consequently, the request for an interim order was denied, leaving the contested administrative situation unchanged.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

§ 32 BVerfGG, § 32 Abs. 1 BVerfGG; Interim relief under § 32 BVerfGG: Inadmissibility due to insufficient substantiation of prerequisites: The applicant sought a temporary injunction under Section 32 of the Federal Constitutional Court Act, but failed to provide the required sufficient substantiation of the prerequisites for such an order. The court emphasized that the applicant did not adequately demonstrate the imminent risk or specific harm necessary to justify the extraordinary procedural remedy, citing established case law on the strict substantiation standards for emergency relief. Consequently, the request for an interim order was denied, leaving the contested administrative situation unchanged.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
procedimento sommario presupposto processuale danno imminente licenziamento amministrativo stato d'emergenza motivazione inadeguata delle censure costituzionali

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Generato dall'IA

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
§ 32 Abs. 1 BVerfGG

Cited in the dispositive as the specific statutory prerequisite that was not sufficiently substantiated, resulting in the rejection of the application for interim relief.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Ablehnung des Erlasses einer eA mit Tenorbegründung: Voraussetzungen des § 32 BVerfGG nicht hinreichend substantiiert dargelegt

[TENOR]

Der Antrag auf Erlass einer einstweiligen Anordnung wird abgelehnt. Er ist unzulässig; es fehlt an der hinreichenden Substantiierung des Vorliegens der Voraussetzungen des § 32 Abs. 1 BVerfGG (vgl. BVerfG, Beschluss der 1. Kammer des Ersten Senats vom 17. November 2006 - 1 BvQ 33/06 - juris; Beschlüsse der 3. Kammer des Zweiten Senats vom 28. November 2008 - 2 BvQ 36/08 - und 10. September 2009 - 2 BvQ 58/09 - juris).

Diese Entscheidung ist unanfechtbar.