Partial cost reimbursement and subject matter value assessment in constitutional complaint proceedings under § 34a BVerfGG and §§ 37, 22 RVG
Germania (DE)
Sintesi Legislator
Generato dall'IAThe Federal Constitutional Court ordered the Federal Republic of Germany to reimburse one-third of the complainants' necessary legal expenses and set the subject matter value for attorney services at €1,000,000 for the main proceedings and €500,000 for interim measures. This decision addressed the procedural consequences of prior rulings that had partially dismissed and partially rejected the constitutional complaints, determining whether the complainants were entitled to cost reimbursement despite their partial lack of success. The Court held that although the complaints did not fully prevail, they contributed to the clarification of questions of fundamental importance, thereby justifying an ex aequo et bono reimbursement of one-third of the costs pursuant to § 34a(3) of the Federal Constitutional Court Act (BVerfGG), with the subject matter values fixed according to §§ 37(2) and 22(1) of the Legal Services Fee Act (RVG).
Regesto Legislator
Generato dall'IA§ 34a Abs 3 BVerfGG, § 22 Abs. 1 RVG, § 37 Abs. 2, § 22 Abs. 1 RVG; Partial cost reimbursement and subject matter value assessment in constitutional complaint proceedings under § 34a BVerfGG and §§ 37, 22 RVG: This decision addressed the procedural consequences of prior rulings that had partially dismissed and partially rejected the constitutional complaints, determining whether the complainants were entitled to cost reimbursement despite their partial lack of success. The Court held that although the complaints did not fully prevail, they contributed to the clarification of questions of fundamental importance, thereby justifying an ex aequo et bono reimbursement of one-third of the costs pursuant to § 34a(3) of the Federal Constitutional Court Act (BVerfGG), with the subject matter values fixed according to §§ 37(2) and 22(1) of the Legal Services Fee Act (RVG).
Parole chiave
Generato dall'IADisposizioni normative citate
Generato dall'IAGiurisprudenza citata
Generato dall'IADecisioni correlate
Generato dall'IAQuestioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator
Generato dall'IABasis for setting the subject matter value for the attorney's services in the main and interim proceedings.
Testo completo
Anordnung der Auslagenerstattung zu einem Drittel (§ 34a Abs 3 BVerfGG) trotz teilweiser Verwerfung bzw Zurückweisung der Anträge in der Hauptsache - Gegenstandswertfestsetzung
[TENOR]
Die Bundesrepublik Deutschland hat den Beschwerdeführern ihre notwendigen Auslagen zu einem Drittel zu erstatten.
Der Wert des Gegenstandes der anwaltlichen Tätigkeit der Bevollmächtigten im Hauptsacheverfahren wird jeweils auf 1.000.000 € (in Worten: eine Million Euro) und im Verfahren über den Erlass einer einstweiligen Anordnung jeweils auf 500.000 € (in Worten: fünfhunderttausend Euro) festgesetzt (§ 37 Abs. 2, § 22 Abs. 1 RVG).
[GRUENDE]
Die Entscheidung über die Anordnung der Erstattung der Auslagen beruht auf § 34a Abs. 3 BVerfGG. Die Verfassungsbeschwerden sind zwar teilweise verworfen und teilweise zurückgewiesen worden, haben aber in der Sache zur Klärung von Fragen von grundsätzlicher Bedeutung beigetragen (vgl. BVerfGE 36, 146 ; 109, 190 ; 116, 69 ; 130, 1 ).
Es entspricht der Billigkeit, den Beschwerdeführern die durch das Verfassungsbeschwerdeverfahren entstandenen notwendigen Auslagen in Höhe von einem Drittel zu erstatten.