Non-admission of constitutional complaint without reasoning under § 93d BVerfGG
Sintesi Legislator
Generato dall'IAThe Federal Constitutional Court of Germany did not admit the constitutional complaint for decision, rendering the challenge unsuccessful and leaving the lower court's decision in force; the court explicitly refrained from providing a reasoning for this non-acceptance under § 93d (1) sentence 3 of the Federal Constitutional Court Act (BVerfGG). The dispute concerned a constitutional complaint filed with the First Senate's First Chamber, specifically identified by case number 1 BvR 161/17, challenging a prior judicial act without the specific subject matter detailed in the unexplained order. The decisive legal basis was the procedural authority to issue a non-admission order without grounds under § 93d BVerfGG, which renders the decision final and unappealable.
Regesto Legislator
Generato dall'IA§ 93d Abs. 1 Satz 3 BVerfGG; Non-admission of constitutional complaint without reasoning under § 93d BVerfGG: The dispute concerned a constitutional complaint filed with the First Senate's First Chamber, specifically identified by case number 1 BvR 161/17, challenging a prior judicial act without the specific subject matter detailed in the unexplained order. The decisive legal basis was the procedural authority to issue a non-admission order without grounds under § 93d BVerfGG, which renders the decision final and unappealable.
Parole chiave
Generato dall'IADisposizioni normative citate
Generato dall'IADecisioni correlate
Generato dall'IAQuestioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator
Generato dall'IAProcedural basis cited in the dispositive to justify the omission of a reasoning for the non-admission of the constitutional complaint.
Testo completo
Nichtannahmebeschluss ohne Begründung
[TENOR] Die Verfassungsbeschwerde wird nicht zur Entscheidung angenommen.
Von einer Begründung wird nach § 93d Abs. 1 Satz 3 BVerfGG abgesehen.
Diese Entscheidung ist unanfechtbar.