Non-admission of constitutional complaints challenging criminal proceedings without reasoning under § 93d BVerfG

The Federal Constitutional Court dismissed the constitutional complaints without granting them admission for decision and deemed the associated motions for interim relief moot, thereby upholding the lower court's rulings; the complainants challenged decisions in criminal proceedings, though the specific factual basis of the offenses remains unspecified in this unreasoned order. The non-admission was based on the court's determination that the complaints did not meet the admissibility requirements, and the decision was rendered without reasoning pursuant to § 93d Abs. 1 Satz 3 BVerfGG and the procedural provisions of the Court Rules, resulting in a final, unappealable judgment that leaves the contested lower court decisions in force.