Constitutional complaint inadmissible for missed filing deadline; reinstatement denied due to lack of unattributable delay
Germania (DE)
Sintesi Legislator
Generato dall'IAThe Federal Constitutional Court (1st Senate, 1st Chamber) rejected the applicant's request for reinstatement and declined to accept the constitutional complaint for decision, leaving the outcome in the lower courts' favor. The dispute concerned the procedural admissibility of a constitutional complaint, where the applicant failed to file the initial complaint and its legal justification within the statutory deadlines. The Court held the complaint inadmissible under § 93(1) Sentence 1 BVerfGG due to the missed deadline and denied the ancillary reinstatement application under § 93(2) Sentence 1 BVerfGG because the applicant did not assert valid grounds for unattributable delay. Relying on § 93d(1) BVerfGG, the Court dispensed with further reasoning, rendering the decision final and unappealable.
Regesto Legislator
Generato dall'IA§ 93 Abs. 1 Satz 1 BVerfGG, § 93 Abs. 2 Satz 1 BVerfGG, § 93d Abs. 1 Satz 3 in Verbindung mit Satz 1 BVerfGG; Constitutional complaint inadmissible for missed filing deadline; reinstatement denied due to lack of unattributable delay: The dispute concerned the procedural admissibility of a constitutional complaint, where the applicant failed to file the initial complaint and its legal justification within the statutory deadlines. The Court held the complaint inadmissible under § 93(1) Sentence 1 BVerfGG due to the missed deadline and denied the ancillary reinstatement application under § 93(2) Sentence 1 BVerfGG because the applicant did not assert valid grounds for unattributable delay. Relying on § 93d(1) BVerfGG, the Court dispensed with further reasoning, rendering the decision final and unappealable.
Parole chiave
Generato dall'IADisposizioni normative citate
Generato dall'IADecisioni correlate
Generato dall'IAQuestioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator
Generato dall'IACited in the first order to establish the inadmissibility of the constitutional complaint due to the missed deadline.
Cited in the second order to justify the rejection of the request for reinstatement for lack of valid grounds.
Cited in the third order to dispense with a detailed statement of reasons.
Testo completo
Nichtannahmebeschluss: Unzulässigkeit der Verfassungsbeschwerde bei Versäumung der Frist des § 93 Abs 1 S 1 BVerfGG - Ablehnung der Wiedereinsetzung in den vorigen Stand mangels Geltendmachung tauglicher Wiedereinsetzungsgründe
[TENOR]
Der Antrag auf Wiedereinsetzung in den vorigen Stand wird abgelehnt.
Die Verfassungsbeschwerde wird nicht zur Entscheidung angenommen.
[GRUENDE]
Die Verfassungsbeschwerde wird nicht zur Entscheidung angenommen, da sie wegen Versäumung der Beschwerde- und Begründungsfrist des § 93 Abs. 1 Satz 1 BVerfGG unzulässig ist.
Der Antrag auf Wiedereinsetzung war abzulehnen, weil keine tauglichen Wiedereinsetzungsgründe für eine unverschuldete Fristversäumnis geltend gemacht wurden (§ 93 Abs. 2 Satz 1 BVerfGG).
Von einer Begründung im Übrigen wird nach § 93d Abs. 1 Satz 3 in Verbindung mit Satz 1 BVerfGG abgesehen.
Diese Entscheidung ist unanfechtbar.