Constitutional complaint rejected for insufficient allegation of causal link between hearing right violation and administrative court’s finding of adequate medical treatment abroad

The Federal Constitutional Court rejected the constitutional complaint, leaving the administrative court’s order intact and ruling that the respondent did not prevail on the merits. The dispute concerned a challenge to an administrative court decision which had denied protection claims on the basis that sufficient medical treatment options existed in the applicant’s country of origin. The decisive legal basis was the procedural requirement under German constitutional law that a complainant must specifically demonstrate that a violation of their right to be heard (Gehörsverstoß) directly influenced the outcome; the Court held that the administrative judgment was independently sustainable based on the sufficiency of medical care, and the complainant failed to articulate what additional arguments she would have presented had the lower court adequately informed her of the procedural situation.