Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
2 BvR 3/16 ECLI:DE:BVerfG:2016:rs20160713.2bvr000316 Generato dall'IA

Reimbursement of costs in constitutional complaint following amendment of the contested migration decision

Numero d'incarto 2 BvR 3/16
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Germania (DE)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio struck_off
Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Federal Constitutional Court dismissed the constitutional complaint as moot after the complainant declared the matter resolved, thereby prevailing on procedural costs; consequently, the Federal Republic of Germany was ordered to reimburse the complainant's necessary expenses under § 34a(3) BVerfGG because the competent administrative authority had amended the contested migration decision following a re-examination. The dispute concerned a constitutional complaint and a parallel application for interim relief against an administrative act by the Federal Office for Migration and Refugees, with the Court fixing the matter value at €10,000 for the main proceedings and €5,000 for the interim relief proceedings. The decision rests on the provisions of the Federal Constitutional Court Act regarding the settlement of costs and the determination of matter value in constitutional proceedings.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

§ 34a Abs. 3 BVerfGG; Reimbursement of costs in constitutional complaint following amendment of the contested migration decision: The dispute concerned a constitutional complaint and a parallel application for interim relief against an administrative act by the Federal Office for Migration and Refugees, with the Court fixing the matter value at €10,000 for the main proceedings and €5,000 for the interim relief proceedings. The decision rests on the provisions of the Federal Constitutional Court Act regarding the settlement of costs and the determination of matter value in constitutional proceedings.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
oggetto della lite rimborso delle spese reclamo amministrativo procedimento sommario censure di diritto costituzionale revisione in materia d'asilo

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
§ 34a Abs. 3 BVerfGG
Provision cited in the dispositive to order the reimbursement of the complainant's necessary expenses.
Generato dall'IA
2 BvR 2987/14
Reimbursement of necessary litigation expenses upon administrative revocation of the contested act in constitutional complaint proceedings
2 BvR 2160/17
Reimbursement of costs in constitutional complaint following grant of legal aid in asylum proceedings
2 BvR 1204/19
Reimbursement of constitutional complaint costs after declaration of mootness due to voluntary suspension of deportation order
2 BvR 622/22
Reimbursement of litigation expenses in constitutional complaint after mooting due to self-correction of detention order by lower courts
1 BvR 1671/10
Reimbursement of constitutional complaint costs after withdrawal of the challenged act and exclusion of interim relief expenses

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
§ 34a Abs. 3 BVerfGG

Provision cited in the dispositive to order the reimbursement of the complainant's necessary expenses.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Gegenstandswertfestsetzung und Anordnung der Auslagenerstattung im Verfassungsbeschwerdeverfahren mit Tenorbegründung

[TENOR]

Das Verfahren wird eingestellt, nachdem der Beschwerdeführer es für erledigt erklärt hat.

Damit erledigt sich der Antrag auf Erlass einer einstweiligen Anordnung.

Die Bundesrepublik Deutschland hat dem Beschwerdeführer die notwendigen Auslagen gemäß § 34a Abs. 3 BVerfGG zu erstatten, da das Bundesamt für Migration und Flüchtlinge den streitgegenständlichen Bescheid nach nochmaliger Prüfung abgeändert hat.

Der Gegenstandswert wird für das Verfassungsbeschwerdeverfahren auf 10.000 Euro (in Worten: zehntausend Euro) und für das Verfahren auf Erlass einer einstweiligen Anordnung auf 5.000 Euro (in Worten: fünftausend Euro) festgesetzt.

Diese Entscheidung ist unanfechtbar.