Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
2 BvC 20/15 ECLI:DE:BVerfG:2016:cs20160622.2bvc002015 Generato dall'IA

Election review complaint rejected without further reasoning under § 26(3) sentence 3 EuWG and § 24 sentence 2 BVerfGG; reinstatement application denied

Numero d'incarto 2 BvC 20/15
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Germania (DE)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Respinto (Dismissed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Federal Constitutional Court dismissed the applicant's petition for reinstatement to the previous status and rejected the election review complaint with immediate effect, resulting in the applicant's defeat. The dispute concerned a constitutional complaint against the validity of European Parliament elections, where the Court found no merit in the challenge as per the reporting judge's prior assessment. The decision was rendered without further reasoning pursuant to Section 26(3), Sentence 3 of the Act on the Election of Members of the European Parliament in conjunction with Section 24, Sentence 2 of the Federal Constitutional Court Act, which permits omitting detailed grounds when the rejection is based on existing legal evaluations.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

§ 24 Satz 2 BVerfGG, § 26 Abs. 3 Satz 3 EuWG in Verbindung mit § 24 Satz 2 BVerfGG; Election review complaint rejected without further reasoning under § 26(3) sentence 3 EuWG and § 24 sentence 2 BVerfGG; reinstatement application denied: The dispute concerned a constitutional complaint against the validity of European Parliament elections, where the Court found no merit in the challenge as per the reporting judge's prior assessment. The decision was rendered without further reasoning pursuant to Section 26(3), Sentence 3 of the Act on the Election of Members of the European Parliament in conjunction with Section 24, Sentence 2 of the Federal Constitutional Court Act, which permits omitting detailed grounds when the rejection is based on existing legal evaluations.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
elezioni europee validità delle elezioni statuto giuridico europeo motivo di revisione ricorso costituzionale all'estero diritto alla risoluzione del contratto

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
§ 24 Satz 2 BVerfGG
3 Satz 3 EuWG in Verbindung mit § 24 Satz 2 BVerfGG wird von einer weiteren Begründung abgesehen.
§ 26 Abs. 3 Satz 3 EuWG in Verbindung mit § 24 Satz 2 BVerfGG
Provides the procedural basis for rejecting the complaint and omitting a further written reasoning.
Generato dall'IA
2 BvC 9/15
Election validity review; waiver of written reasoning under § 26 Abs. 3 Satz 3 EuWG in conjunction with § 24 Satz 2 BVerfGG
2 BvC 19/15
Election review complaint dismissed for lack of merit under the European Parliament Election Act
2 BvC 60/19
Verification of European Parliament election results; dismissal of electoral complaint without further reasoning pursuant to § 26 Abs. 3 Satz 3 EuWG
2 BvC 13/15
Unreasoned aliminen dismissal of election challenge under § 26(3) EuWG
2 BvC 34/14
Electoral review complaint rejected without reasoned decision under § 24 Sentence 2 BVerfGG

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
§ 26 Abs. 3 Satz 3 EuWG in Verbindung mit § 24 Satz 2 BVerfGG

Provides the procedural basis for rejecting the complaint and omitting a further written reasoning.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Verwerfung (a-limine-Abweisung) einer Wahlprüfungsbeschwerde ohne weitere Begründung - Ablehnung eines Wiedereinsetzungsantrags

[TENOR]

Der Antrag auf Wiedereinsetzung in den vorigen Stand wird abgelehnt.

Die Wahlprüfungsbeschwerde wird verworfen.

[GRUENDE]

Der Wahlprüfungsbeschwerde bleibt aus den im Schreiben des Berichterstatters vom 12. April 2016 genannten Gründen der Erfolg versagt. Gemäß § 26 Abs. 3 Satz 3 EuWG in Verbindung mit § 24 Satz 2 BVerfGG wird von einer weiteren Begründung abgesehen.