Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
2 BvF 1/15 ECLI:DE:BVerfG:2016:fs20160215.2bvf000115 Generato dall'IA

Suspension of census data retention provision pending norm control decision

Numero d'incarto 2 BvF 1/15
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Germania (DE)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Accolto (Allowed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Federal Constitutional Court (Second Senate) ordered the repetition of a provisional injunction for an additional six months, suspending § 19 of the Census Act 2011 until a decision on the merits is rendered or the six-month period expires, thereby effectively upholding the previous order that kept the contested provision out of effect. This proceeding was a repetition application within an abstract norm control case, where the petitioner sought to extend the interim protection against the application of the data protection provisions of the census legislation previously suspended on August 26, 2015. The Court determined that the repetition was justified because the statutory prerequisites for the initial issuance of a provisional injunction, specifically under § 32 Abs. 6 Satz 2 BVerfGG, remained satisfied, relying on the legal reasoning established in the earlier decision from August 2015.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

§ 32 Abs. 6 Satz 2 BVerfGG; Suspension of census data retention provision pending norm control decision: This proceeding was a repetition application within an abstract norm control case, where the petitioner sought to extend the interim protection against the application of the data protection provisions of the census legislation previously suspended on August 26, 2015. The Court determined that the repetition was justified because the statutory prerequisites for the initial issuance of a provisional injunction, specifically under § 32 Abs. 6 Satz 2 BVerfGG, remained satisfied, relying on the legal reasoning established in the earlier decision from August 2015.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
diritto sulla protezione dei dati sospensione provvisionale ufficio di controllo degli abitanti tutela legale proroga della carcerazione catalogo elettorale

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
§ 32 Abs. 6 Satz 2 BVerfGG
Procedural rule cited in the dispositive that authorizes the repetition of the earlier provisional order.

Giurisprudenza citata

Generato dall'IA
BVerfGE 21, 50
BVerfGE 21, 50 ; 89, 113 ; 97, 102 ; BVerfG, Beschluss der 2.
2 BvR 547/13
Offsetting of party sanction payments against state subsidies and proportionality of fault-independent liability under the German Parties Act

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
§ 32 Abs. 6 Satz 2 BVerfGG

Procedural rule cited in the dispositive that authorizes the repetition of the earlier provisional order.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Wiederholung einer eA im Verfahren der abstrakten Normenkontrolle: Vorläufige Außervollzugsetzung des § 19 ZensG 2011Zensusgesetz 2011

[TENOR]

Die einstweilige Anordnung vom 26. August 2015 wird für die Dauer von weiteren sechs Monaten, längstens jedoch bis zur Entscheidung in der Hauptsache, wiederholt (§ 32 Abs. 6 Satz 2 BVerfGG).

[GRUENDE]

I. Das Bundesverfassungsgericht hat durch einstweilige Anordnung vom 26. August 2015 § 19 des Gesetzes über den registergestützten Zensus im Jahre 2011 (Zensusgesetz 2011) vom 8. Juli 2009 (BGBl I S. 1781) bis zur Entscheidung in der Hauptsache, längstens für die Dauer von sechs Monaten, außer Vollzug gesetzt.

II. Das Bundesverfassungsgericht kann eine einstweilige Anordnung dann wiederholen, wenn die gesetzlichen Voraussetzungen für den erstmaligen Erlass einer solchen Anordnung noch gegeben sind (vgl. BVerfGE 21, 50 ; 89, 113 ; 97, 102 ; BVerfG, Beschluss der 2. Kammer des Zweiten Senats vom 9. Juni 2004 - 2 BvQ 70/03 -, juris, Rn. 3; Beschluss der 2. Kammer des Zweiten Senats vom 11. November 2013 - 2 BvR 547/13 -, juris, Rn. 6). Dies ist vorliegend der Fall. Zur Begründung wird auf den Beschluss vom 26. August 2015 verwiesen.