Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
2 BvQ 9/16 ECLI:DE:BVerfG:2016:qk20160208.2bvq000916 Generato dall'IA

Constitutional court provisional injunction application rejected due to insufficient substantiation of non-obviousness of main complaint

Numero d'incarto 2 BvQ 9/16
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Germania (DE)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Respinto (Dismissed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Federal Constitutional Court dismissed the applicant's motion for provisional relief, ruling in favor of the respondent state. The dispute involved a request for an interim injunction challenging a procedural decision, which the applicant failed to substantiate sufficiently to demonstrate that a potential main complaint would be admissible and not evidently unfounded. Applying the requirement that motions for provisional measures must be adequately substantiated to establish the prospect of success in the main proceedings, the Court rejected the application without examining the merits, thereby leaving the status quo intact.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Constitutional court provisional injunction application rejected due to insufficient substantiation of non-obviousness of main complaint: Der Antrag auf Erlass einer einstweiligen Anordnung wird abgelehnt, weil der Antragsteller nicht substantiiert dargelegt hat, dass der - gegebenenfalls noch zu stellende - Antrag in der Hauptsache weder unzulässig noch offensichtlich unbegründet ist (vgl. BVerfG, Beschluss der 2. Kammer des Ersten Senats vom 20. August 2015 - 1 BvQ 28/15 -, juris; Beschluss der 2. Kammer des Zweiten Senats vom 30. September 2015 - 2 BvQ 29/15 -, juris).

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
requisito costituzionale provvedimenti provvisori procedimento pregiudiziale d'urgenza eccezione di incostituzionalità censura formulata in modo carente mancanza di prova
Generato dall'IA
2 BvQ 39/16
Insufficient substantiation of isolated interim injunction application and failure to demonstrate admissibility of main constitutional complaint
2 BvQ 89/22
Constitutional application for temporary injunction rejected for lack of substantiated prospects of success in the main proceedings
2 BvQ 103/21
Failure to substantiate admissibility and merits of main constitutional complaint bars interim relief
2 BvQ 62/21
Inadmissibility of urgent constitutional relief for insufficient substantiation of main complaint prospects under § 32 BVerfGG
1 BvQ 82/19
Interim relief denial where pending constitutional complaint exhibits obvious substantive reasoning deficiencies

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Ablehnung eines Antrags auf Erlass einer einstweiligen Anordnung mit Tenorbegründung - unzureichende Substantiierung des eA-Antrags

[TENOR]

Der Antrag auf Erlass einer einstweiligen Anordnung wird abgelehnt, weil der Antragsteller nicht substantiiert dargelegt hat, dass der - gegebenenfalls noch zu stellende - Antrag in der Hauptsache weder unzulässig noch offensichtlich unbegründet ist (vgl. BVerfG, Beschluss der 2. Kammer des Ersten Senats vom 20. August 2015 - 1 BvQ 28/15 -, juris; Beschluss der 2. Kammer des Zweiten Senats vom 30. September 2015 - 2 BvQ 29/15 -, juris).

Diese Entscheidung ist unanfechtbar.