Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
1 BvR 2371/13 ECLI:DE:BVerfG:2015:rk20150923.1bvr237113 Generato dall'IA

Constitutional review of a civil judgment challenging the compatibility of the lower court's statutory interpretation with fundamental rights.

Numero d'incarto 1 BvR 2371/13
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Germania (DE)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Inammissibile (Inadmissible)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Federal Constitutional Court's First Chamber issued a non-acceptance order, dismissing the constitutional complaint and leaving the challenged decision of the Federal Court of Justice in force. The dispute concerned an alleged violation of the complainant's fundamental rights by a lower court ruling; however, the Court found no infringement because the underlying legal situation, as interpreted by the Federal Court of Justice, was compatible with the complainant's constitutional rights. The decision relied on § 93d para. 1 sentence 3 BVerfGG to dispense with a further detailed justification and is final and unappealable.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

§ 93d Abs. 1 Satz 3 BVerfGG; Constitutional review of a civil judgment challenging the compatibility of the lower court's statutory interpretation with fundamental rights: The dispute concerned an alleged violation of the complainant's fundamental rights by a lower court ruling; however, the Court found no infringement because the underlying legal situation, as interpreted by the Federal Court of Justice, was compatible with the complainant's constitutional rights. The decision relied on § 93d para. 1 sentence 3 BVerfGG to dispense with a further detailed justification and is final and unappealable.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
interpretazione della sentenza causa civile diritti fondamentali motivazione inadeguata delle censure costituzionali diritto legale denuncia penale

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Generato dall'IA

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
§ 93d Abs. 1 Satz 3 BVerfGG

Cited in the dispositive to justify the omission of a further detailed justification for the decision.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Nichtannahmebeschluss: keine Verletzung von Grundrechten durch angegriffene Entscheidung

[GRUENDE]

Die angegriffene Entscheidung verletzt die Beschwerdeführerin nicht in ihren Grundrechten. Insbesondere ist die zugrundeliegende Rechtslage in der vom Bundesgerichtshof gewählten Auslegung mit den Grundrechten der Beschwerdeführerin vereinbar.

Von einer weiteren Begründung wird nach § 93d Abs. 1 Satz 3 BVerfGG abgesehen.

Diese Entscheidung ist unanfechtbar.