Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
1 BvQ 14/15 ECLI:DE:BVerfG:2015:qk20150728.1bvq001415 Generato dall'IA

Interim relief for constitutional complaint rejected due to failure to meet § 23 BVerfGG substantiation requirements

Numero d'incarto 1 BvQ 14/15
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Germania (DE)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Inammissibile (Inadmissible)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Federal Constitutional Court dismissed the applicant's request for interim relief, ruling the application inadmissible and issuing an unchallengeable order. The dispute involved a request for provisional protection, where the applicant failed to substantiate the urgency and likelihood of success required for such measures. The decisive legal basis was Section 23, Paragraph 1, Sentence 2 of the Federal Constitutional Court Act (BVerfGG), which mandates specific justification requirements for constitutional complaints; the Court held that these standards apply equally to applications for interim relief, and the applicant's filing did not meet this threshold.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

§ 23 Abs. 1 Satz 2 BVerfGG, § 23 Abs. 1 S. 2 BVerfGG; Interim relief for constitutional complaint rejected due to failure to meet § 23 BVerfGG substantiation requirements: The dispute involved a request for provisional protection, where the applicant failed to substantiate the urgency and likelihood of success required for such measures. The decisive legal basis was Section 23, Paragraph 1, Sentence 2 of the Federal Constitutional Court Act (BVerfGG), which mandates specific justification requirements for constitutional complaints; the Court held that these standards apply equally to applications for interim relief, and the applicant's filing did not meet this threshold.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
requisito costituzionale procedimento sommario tutela legale ricorso costituzionale all'estero procedimento pregiudiziale d'urgenza rigetto provvisorio dell'opposizione

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
§ 23 Abs. 1 Satz 2 BVerfGG
BVerfGE 122, 63 ) - Begründungsanforderungen des § 23 Abs. 1 Satz 2 BVerfGG.
§ 23 Abs. 1 S. 2 BVerfGG
Cited in the dispositive as the specific legal basis for declaring the application for interim relief inadmissible due to failure to meet justification requirements.

Giurisprudenza citata

Generato dall'IA
BVerfGE 122, 63
BVerfGE 122, 63 ) - Begründungsanforderungen des § 23 Abs.
Generato dall'IA
2 BvQ 63/22
Constitutional complaint for interim relief rejected due to insufficient substantiation of § 32(1) BVerfGG requirements
2 BvR 671/26
Denial of interim relief in constitutional complaint for failure to substantiate potential fundamental rights violation under BVerfGG
2 BvQ 101/18
Constitutional interim relief denied for failure to substantiate the principle of subsidiarity of constitutional complaints
1 BvR 1672/19
Interim relief in constitutional complaints: rejection due to insufficient substantiation of severe disadvantages and urgency.
1 BvQ 66/17
Denial of interim relief due to manifest lack of substantiation of constitutional complaint

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
§ 23 Abs. 1 S. 2 BVerfGG

Cited in the dispositive as the specific legal basis for declaring the application for interim relief inadmissible due to failure to meet justification requirements.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Ablehnung des Erlasses einer eA mangels hinreichender Begründung (§ 23 Abs 1 S 2 BVerfGG)

[GRUENDE]

Der Antrag ist unzulässig. Er genügt nicht den - auch im Verfahren des einstweiligen Rechtsschutzes geltenden (vgl. BVerfGE 122, 63 ) - Begründungsanforderungen des § 23 Abs. 1 Satz 2 BVerfGG.

Die Entscheidung ist unanfechtbar.