Constitutional complaint inadmissible for failure to exhaust remedies by not responding to a § 522(2) sentence 2 ZPO notice

§ 522 Abs. 2 Satz 2 ZPO, § 93d Abs. 1 Satz 3 BVerfGG, § 522 Abs. 2 S. 2 ZPO, § 93d Abs. 1 S. 3 BVerfGG; Constitutional complaint inadmissible for failure to exhaust remedies by not responding to a § 522(2) sentence 2 ZPO notice: The dispute concerned a family law matter where the applicant challenged the substantive content of regional court rulings via a constitutional complaint but had previously failed to submit a statement or raise specific objections against a notice served pursuant to § 522(2) sentence 2 of the Code of Civil Procedure. The Court held that the complaint violated the constitutional requirement of subsidiarity (exhaustion of legal remedies), as the applicant had not taken all reasonable steps to assert her rights before the specialized courts, thereby precluding the Court from examining the alleged substantive constitutional defects in the lower courts' reasoning.