Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
1 BvR 629/13 ECLI:DE:BVerfG:2015:rk20150414.1bvr062913 Generato dall'IA

Unregistered assembly: Whether registration with an unauthorized authority exempts organizers from penalties where no forwarding to competent authority is established

Numero d'incarto 1 BvR 629/13
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Germania (DE)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Respinto (Dismissed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Federal Constitutional Court refused to accept the constitutional complaint for review, thereby upholding the lower court’s decision to reprimand the complainant for holding an unregistered assembly. The dispute concerned whether a formal warning constituted an unlawful violation of assembly rights when the complainant had registered the event with an unauthorized authority rather than the competent one. The court held that the lower court’s assessment was within its discretionary margin because it did not rely solely on the registration error, but also on the absence of sufficient indications that the unauthorized authority would forward the registration to the competent body; the decision was final and unchallengeable.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

§ 93d Abs. 1 Satz 3 BVerfGG; Unregistered assembly: Whether registration with an unauthorized authority exempts organizers from penalties where no forwarding to competent authority is established: The dispute concerned whether a formal warning constituted an unlawful violation of assembly rights when the complainant had registered the event with an unauthorized authority rather than the competent one. The court held that the lower court’s assessment was within its discretionary margin because it did not rely solely on the registration error, but also on the absence of sufficient indications that the unauthorized authority would forward the registration to the competent body; the decision was final and unchallengeable.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
ammonizione assenza ingiustificata libertà di riunione e di associazione diritto acquisito messa in pericolo dell'ordine costituzionale difetto di legittimazione dell'associazione

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
§ 93d Abs. 1 Satz 3 BVerfGG
Procedural rule applied to waive further reasoning on the non-acceptance decision.
Generato dall'IA
6 B 22/22
Assembly law conflict: continuation declaratory interest and procedural error from erroneous substantive judgment
1 BvR 1257/19
Liability of factual assembly leader under § 26 No. 2 Assembly Act: compatibility with the prohibition of judicial analogy and the freedom of assembly
1 BvR 2298/10
Non-acceptance of constitutional complaint against assembly ban for lack of general constitutional significance
6 B 22/20
Relocation of political assembly due to private event security conflicts with constitutional assembly freedom
6 B 149/18
Enforcement of assembly law orders under general police law where specific enforcement provisions are absent

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
§ 93d Abs. 1 Satz 3 BVerfGG

Procedural rule applied to waive further reasoning on the non-acceptance decision.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Nichtannahmebeschluss: Verwarnung wegen Durchführung einer unangemeldeten Versammlung im Ergebnis nicht zu beanstanden - hier: Anmeldung bei unzuständiger Behörde und Fehlen von Anhaltspunkten für Weiterleitung an zuständige Behörde

[GRUENDE]

Die angegriffenen Entscheidungen halten sich im fachgerichtlichen Wertungsrahmen. Das Landgericht stützt die Verwarnung des Beschwerdeführers nicht schon für sich tragend darauf, dass dieser die von ihm veranstaltete Versammlung bei der unzuständigen Behörde angezeigt hat. Vielmehr stellt es maßgeblich auch darauf ab, dass keine hinreichenden Umstände ersichtlich seien, auf die der Beschwerdeführer die Annahme hätte stützen können, die Anmeldung werde an die zuständige Versammlungsbehörde weitergeleitet. Diese Würdigung ist vertretbar.

Von einer weiteren Begründung wird nach § 93d Abs. 1 Satz 3 BVerfGG abgesehen.

Diese Entscheidung ist unanfechtbar.