Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
2 BvR 48/13 ECLI:DE:BVerfG:2015:rk20150224.2bvr004813 Generato dall'IA

Inadmissibility of constitutional complaint for failure to exhaust legal remedies on ECHR allegations

Numero d'incarto 2 BvR 48/13
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Germania (DE)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Inammissibile (Inadmissible)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Federal Constitutional Court (Second Chamber) dismissed the constitutional complaint without further consideration, leaving the underlying proceedings intact. The complainant challenged a decision by a lower court, alleging violations of fundamental rights and the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR). The Court ruled that the complaint was inadmissible because the complainant had not exhausted the ordinary legal remedies specifically regarding the ECHR-based arguments, a procedural prerequisite for admissibility in such cases.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Inadmissibility of constitutional complaint for failure to exhaust legal remedies on ECHR allegations: Die Verfassungsbeschwerde wird nicht zur Entscheidung angenommen; insbesondere hat die Beschwerdeführerin, soweit sie sich zur Begründung einer behaupteten Grundrechtsverletzung auf einen Verstoß gegen die Europäische Menschenrechtskonvention beruft, den Rechtsweg nicht ordnungsgemäß erschöpft (vgl. BVerfGE 112, 50; 129, 78 ).

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
motivazione inadeguata delle censure costituzionali convenzione europea dei diritti dell'uomo violazione dei diritti procedurali procedura ordinaria esaurimento delle istanze inesigibilità dell'esecuzione dell'allontanamento

Giurisprudenza citata

Generato dall'IA
BVerfGE 112, 50
BVerfGE 112, 50; 129, 78 ).
Generato dall'IA
2 BvR 1681/12
Constitutional complaint rejected for failure to exhaust legal remedies regarding alleged ECHR violations
2 BvR 402/25, 2 BvR 403/25, 2 BvR 450/25, 2 BvR 461/25, 2 BvR 462/25, 2 BvR 463/25, 2 BvR 464/25, 2 BvR 478/25, 2 BvR 479/25, 2 BvR 480/25, 2 BvR 481/25, 2 BvR 482/25, 2 BvR 483/25, 2 BvR 484/25, 2 BvR 485/25, 2 BvR 486/25, 2 BvR 494/25, 2 BvR 508/25, 2 BvR 509/25, 2 BvR 510/25, 2 BvR 511/25, 2 BvR 512/25, 2 BvR 513/25, 2 BvR 514/25, 2 BvR 518/25, 2 BvR 519/25, 2 BvR 523/25, 2 BvR 541/25, 2 BvR 543/25, 2 BvR 544/25, 2 BvR 547/25
Inadmissibility of constitutional complaints for lack of exhaustion of remedies and insufficient reasoning; abuse of legal remedies
2 BvR 1465/12
Non-acceptance of constitutional complaint due to failure to exhaust legal remedies regarding alleged ECHR violation
2 BvR 923/24
Failure to substantiate alleged fundamental rights violation rendering constitutional complaint inadmissible under BVerfGG § 23(1) and § 92
2 BvR 503/14
Constitutional complaint inadmissible due to failure to file hearing objection against right-to-be-heard violation

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Nichtannahmebeschluss ohne Begründung: Mangelnde Rechtswegerschöpfung bzgl der Rüge eines Verstoßes gegen die EMRK (juris: MRK)

[TENOR]

Die Verfassungsbeschwerde wird nicht zur Entscheidung angenommen; insbesondere hat die Beschwerdeführerin, soweit sie sich zur Begründung einer behaupteten Grundrechtsverletzung auf einen Verstoß gegen die Europäische Menschenrechtskonvention beruft, den Rechtsweg nicht ordnungsgemäß erschöpft (vgl. BVerfGE 112, 50; 129, 78 ).

Diese Entscheidung ist unanfechtbar.