Constitutional complaint not admitted for lack of severe detriment in individual freedom review

The Federal Constitutional Court (Second Senate, Second Chamber) refused to admit a constitutional complaint, thereby leaving the contested judicial decision in force, as the applicant did not suffer a severe detriment that would mandate substantive review. The dispute concerned an individual's challenge to a lower court judgment via constitutional complaint, which was not accepted for decision based on the procedural threshold that such admission is optional unless non-admission results in a severe disadvantage to the complainant. The decisive legal basis was the procedural doctrine of non-admission for lack of severe detriment (schwerer Nachteil), a standard used to filter out cases where the impact of the lower court's ruling does not meet the heightened threshold necessary for the Constitutional Court to exercise its jurisdiction.