Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
2 BvR 2947/14 ECLI:DE:BVerfG:2014:rs20141219.2bvr294714 Generato dall'IA

Constitutional challenge to involuntary medical treatment fails for failure to exhaust administrative remedies under the Family Court Code

Numero d'incarto 2 BvR 2947/14
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Germania (DE)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Inammissibile (Inadmissible)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Federal Constitutional Court refused to accept the constitutional complaint, ruling it inadmissible and thus leaving the lower court's authorization of compulsory treatment in force; the complaint challenged the district court's approval of a medical involuntary measure for a person subject to institutional care under German civil law. The Court held that the petitioner failed to exhaust legal remedies by not first filing a statutory objection under § 58 Abs. 1 and § 64 Abs. 1 Sentence 1 FamFG against the district court's decision, thereby violating the admissibility requirement of § 90 Abs. 2 BVerfGG.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

§ 90 Abs. 2 BVerfGG, § 312 Nr. 1 FamFG, § 64 Abs. 1 Satz 1 FamFG, § 93d Abs. 1 Satz 3 BVerfGG, § 58 Abs. 1, § 64 Abs. 1 Satz 1 FamFG; Constitutional challenge to involuntary medical treatment fails for failure to exhaust administrative remedies under the Family Court Code: The Court held that the petitioner failed to exhaust legal remedies by not first filing a statutory objection under § 58 Abs. 1 and § 64 Abs. 1 Sentence 1 FamFG against the district court's decision, thereby violating the admissibility requirement of § 90 Abs. 2 BVerfGG.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
trattamento medico coattivo requisito costituzionale impugnazione di decisioni amministrative eccezione di incostituzionalità base legale inesigibile malgrado lesioni salute

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
§ 90 Abs. 2 BVerfGG
Basis for declaring the constitutional complaint inadmissible due to failure to exhaust legal remedies.
§ 312 Nr. 1 FamFG
Gegen die durch das Amtsgericht Regensburg erfolgte Genehmigung der Einwilligung in eine ärztliche Zwangsmaßnahme nach § 312 Nr. 1 FamFG in Verbindung mit § 1906 Abs.
§ 64 Abs. 1 Satz 1 FamFG
1, § 64 Abs. 1 Satz 1 FamFG Beschwerde beim Amtsgericht Regensburg einlegen.
§ 93d Abs. 1 Satz 3 BVerfGG
Basis for omitting further reasoning in the non-acceptance decision.
§ 58 Abs. 1, § 64 Abs. 1 Satz 1 FamFG
Procedural provisions identifying the required prior objection procedure against the lower court's order that the petitioner failed to complete.
Generato dall'IA
2 BvR 862/15
Inadmissibility of constitutional complaint against involuntary medical treatment authorization for failure to exhaust remedies
2 BvR 1403/14
Constitutional complaint against compulsory medical treatment deemed inadmissible for failure to exhaust ordinary judicial review under FamFG
1 BvR 1575/18
Constitutional Admissibility of Challenge to Hospital-Only Requirement for Involuntary Medical Treatment: Subsidiarity and Ex-Ante Judicial Review
2 BvR 69/23
Inadmissibility of constitutional complaint for failure to submit essential records on judicial review of involuntary psychiatric commitment, forced medication, and physical restraint.
1 BvR 1560/15
Admissibility of constitutional complaint challenging medical study admission criteria without exhaustion of ordinary court proceedings

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
§ 90 Abs. 2 BVerfGG

Basis for declaring the constitutional complaint inadmissible due to failure to exhaust legal remedies.

§ 58 Abs. 1, § 64 Abs. 1 Satz 1 FamFG

Procedural provisions identifying the required prior objection procedure against the lower court's order that the petitioner failed to complete.

§ 93d Abs. 1 Satz 3 BVerfGG

Basis for omitting further reasoning in the non-acceptance decision.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Nichtannahmebeschluss: Mangelnde Rechtswegerschöpfung bzgl einer Zwangsmedikation in der Unterbringung - Statthaftigkeit der Beschwerde gem §§ 58 Abs 1, 64 Abs 1 S 1 FamFG

[GRUENDE]

Die Verfassungsbeschwerde wird nicht zur Entscheidung angenommen, weil sie keine Aussicht auf Erfolg hat. Sie ist unzulässig, weil nicht ersichtlich ist, dass die Beschwerdeführerin vor Erheben der Verfassungsbeschwerde gegen die Zwangsbehandlung um fachgerichtlichen Rechtsschutz nachgesucht hat (§ 90 Abs. 2 BVerfGG).

Gegen die durch das Amtsgericht Regensburg erfolgte Genehmigung der Einwilligung in eine ärztliche Zwangsmaßnahme nach § 312 Nr. 1 FamFG in Verbindung mit § 1906 Abs. 1 bis 3a BGB kann die Beschwerdeführerin gemäß § 58 Abs. 1, § 64 Abs. 1 Satz 1 FamFG Beschwerde beim Amtsgericht Regensburg einlegen.

Von einer weiteren Begründung wird nach § 93d Abs. 1 Satz 3 BVerfGG abgesehen.

Diese Entscheidung ist unanfechtbar.