Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
1 BvR 3169/13 Generato dall'IA

Constitutional complaint rejected for lack of subsidiarity pending resolution of statutory interim dispute in family proceedings

Numero d'incarto 1 BvR 3169/13
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Germania (DE)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Inammissibile (Inadmissible)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Federal Constitutional Court refused to accept the constitutional complaint for decision due to the subsidiarity requirement and the request for interim relief became moot, leaving the complainants to potentially file a new complaint after the final resolution of the underlying proceedings. The dispute concerned a provisional legal matter in family law where the complainants challenged a decision without exhausting the specific statutory interim review procedure. The decisive legal basis was the doctrine of subsidiarity in constitutional law, which requires the exhaustion of ordinary legal remedies, specifically the "Zwischenstreit" (interim dispute) procedure regulated by §§ 167a(3) in conjunction with § 178(2) FamFG and §§ 386 ff. ZPO.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

§§ 386f ZPO, § 178 Abs. 2 FamFG; Constitutional complaint rejected for lack of subsidiarity pending resolution of statutory interim dispute in family proceedings: Die Verfassungsbeschwerde wird wegen der Subsidiarität der Verfassungsbeschwerde nicht zur Entscheidung angenommen. Den Beschwerdeführern bleibt es unbenommen, nach rechtskräftigem Abschluss des in § 167a Abs. 3 in Verbindung mit § 178 Abs. 2 FamFG und §§ 386 f. ZPO geregelten Zwischenstreits eine weitere Verfassungsbeschwerde zu erheben.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
oggetto della lite procedimento sommario requisito costituzionale procedura pendente ammissione provvisoria base legale

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
§§ 386f ZPO
178 Abs 2 FamFG, §§ 386f ZPO
§ 178 Abs. 2 FamFG
3 in Verbindung mit § 178 Abs. 2 FamFG und §§ 386 f.
Generato dall'IA
2 BvQ 101/18
Constitutional interim relief denied for failure to substantiate the principle of subsidiarity of constitutional complaints
1 BvR 340/19
Subsidiarity of constitutional interim relief pending statutory hearing objection proceedings under § 44 FamFG
1 BvQ 66/19
Interim relief for custody dispute denied for failure to exhaust ordinary judicial remedies under the principle of subsidiarity
1 BvR 1390/17
Interim constitutional relief rejected for lack of subsidiarity and failure to demonstrate imminent severe disadvantage in pending civil proceedings
1 BvR 2397/23
Constitutional complaint dismissed for lack of subsidiarity and insufficient reasoning

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Nichtannahme einer Verfassungsbeschwerde wegen Subsidiarität - Möglichkeit erneuter Verfassungsbeschwerde nach rechtskräftigem Abschluss des Zwischenstreits gem §§ 167a Abs 3. 178 Abs 2 FamFG, §§ 386f ZPO

[TENOR]

Die Verfassungsbeschwerde wird wegen der Subsidiarität der Verfassungsbeschwerde nicht zur Entscheidung angenommen. Den Beschwerdeführern bleibt es unbenommen, nach rechtskräftigem Abschluss des in § 167a Abs. 3 in Verbindung mit § 178 Abs. 2 FamFG und §§ 386 f. ZPO geregelten Zwischenstreits eine weitere Verfassungsbeschwerde zu erheben.

Damit erledigt sich der Antrag auf Erlass einer einstweiligen Anordnung.