Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
1 BvR 1236/13 ECLI:DE:BVerfG:2013:rk20130502.1bvr123613 Generato dall'IA

Constitutional challenge to accreditation procedure amendment in mass criminal investigation

Numero d'incarto 1 BvR 1236/13
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Germania (DE)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Inammissibile (Inadmissible)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The German Federal Constitutional Court dismissed the constitutional complaint without further reasoning, holding it unfounded as no fundamental rights were violated, thereby leaving the challenged administrative decision in force and rendering the accompanying request for interim relief moot. The dispute concerned the amendment of the accreditation procedure within the context of a major criminal investigation, where the complainant challenged procedural changes affecting their status. The Court applied § 93d Abs. 1 Satz 3 BVerfGG to omit a detailed justification and noted that the decision is final and unappealable.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

§ 93d Abs. 1 Satz 3 BVerfGG; Constitutional challenge to accreditation procedure amendment in mass criminal investigation: The dispute concerned the amendment of the accreditation procedure within the context of a major criminal investigation, where the complainant challenged procedural changes affecting their status. The Court applied § 93d Abs. 1 Satz 3 BVerfGG to omit a detailed justification and noted that the decision is final and unappealable.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
inchiesta penale diritti procedurali impugnazione di decisioni amministrative eccezione di incostituzionalità diritti fondamentali revisione in materia penale

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Generato dall'IA

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
§ 93d Abs. 1 Satz 3 BVerfGG

Procedural basis cited in the dispositive to justify omitting a further written reasoning for the non-acceptance of the constitutional complaint.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Nichtannahmebeschluss: Verfassungsbeschwerde bzgl Änderung des Akkreditierungsverfahrens im sog. "NSU-Verfahren" unbegründet

[TENOR]

Die Verfassungsbeschwerde wird nicht zur Entscheidung angenommen. Sie ist unbegründet, da Grundrechte des Beschwerdeführers

nicht verletzt sind.

Damit erledigt sich zugleich der Antrag auf Erlass einer einstweiligen Anordnung.

[GRUENDE]

Von einer weiteren Begründung wird nach § 93d Abs. 1 Satz 3 BVerfGG abgesehen.

Diese Entscheidung ist unanfechtbar.