Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
2 BvR 1390/12 Generato dall'IA

Necessity of issuing an enforcement order to implement prior constitutional court guidelines

Numero d'incarto 2 BvR 1390/12
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Germania (DE)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Respinto (Dismissed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Federal Constitutional Court denied the application for the issuance of an enforcement order, ruling that it was not evident that such an order was necessary to implement the guidelines established in the Court's prior judgment regarding the contested matter. The dispute concerned the procedural execution of a substantive constitutional ruling issued by the same Senate on September 12, 2012, specifically addressing the need for judicial compulsion to ensure compliance with the court's directives. The decisive legal basis was the discretion regarding the necessity of enforcement measures, concluding that the mere existence of a prior judgment did not automatically warrant an *Vollstreckungsanordnung* without a clear indication of non-compliance or the specific need for such coercive measures.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Necessity of issuing an enforcement order to implement prior constitutional court guidelines: The dispute concerned the procedural execution of a substantive constitutional ruling issued by the same Senate on September 12, 2012, specifically addressing the need for judicial compulsion to ensure compliance with the court's directives. The decisive legal basis was the discretion regarding the necessity of enforcement measures, concluding that the mere existence of a prior judgment did not automatically warrant an *Vollstreckungsanordnung* without a clear indication of non-compliance or the specific need for such coercive measures.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
autorizzazione all’esecuzione principio costituzionale potere d'apprezzamento del giudice misure coercitive questioni processuali oggetto della lite

Giurisprudenza citata

Generato dall'IA
2 BvR 1421/12
Conditioning ratification of the ESM Treaty on international law declarations capping liability and guaranteeing parliamentary information rights
2 BvR 1438/12
Conditioning ratification of the ESM Treaty on international law declarations capping liability and guaranteeing parliamentary information rights
2 BvR 1439/12
Conditioning ratification of the ESM Treaty on international law declarations capping liability and guaranteeing parliamentary information rights
2 BvR 1440/12
Conditioning ratification of the ESM Treaty on international law declarations capping liability and guaranteeing parliamentary information rights
Generato dall'IA
2 BvQ 60/23
Federal constitutional interim order for civil enforcement halted by exhaustion requirement of ordinary court remedies
1 BvR 1819/15
Constitutional complaint against a parallel court decision declared inadmissible
2 BvR 1176/22
Isolated application for coercive enforcement of a prior Constitutional Court ruling; waiver of reasoned decision under § 24(2) BVerfGG
2 BvR 1021/12
Constitutional complaint against civil judgment: non-acceptance for lack of sufficient constitutional relevance
1 BvR 216/18
Constitutional complaint challenging refusal of effective legal remedy

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Ablehnung eines Antrags auf Erlass einer Vollstreckungsanordnung

[TENOR]

Eine Vollstreckungsanordnung wird nicht erlassen, da nicht zu erkennen ist, dass es zur Durchsetzung der im Urteil des Zweiten

Senats des Bundesverfassungsgerichts vom 12. September 2012 (2 BvE 6/12, 2 BvR 1390/12, 2 BvR 1421/12, 2 BvR 1438/12, 2 BvR

1439/12, 2 BvR 1440/12, EuGRZ 2012, S. 569 ff.) enthaltenen Vorgaben einer solchen Anordnung bedarf.