Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
1 BvR 1234/11 ECLI:DE:BVerfG:2012:rk20120606.1bvr123411 Generato dall'IA

Non-acceptance of constitutional complaint based on parallel decision and waiver of further reasoning under § 93d Abs. 1 BVerfGG

Numero d'incarto 1 BvR 1234/11
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Germania (DE)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Inammissibile (Inadmissible)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Federal Constitutional Court dismissed the constitutional complaint without a hearing, ruling it inadmissible and final. The dispute involved a parallel constitutional complaint that the court linked to a prior decision of its First Chamber dated May 29, 2012. The decisive legal basis for the dismissal was § 93d (1) sentence 3 of the German Federal Constitutional Court Act (BVerfGG), which permits the court to refrain from providing a further legal justification for non-acceptance decisions, resulting in the exhaustion of the petitioner’s constitutional remedies.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

§ 93d Abs. 1 Satz 3 BVerfGG; Non-acceptance of constitutional complaint based on parallel decision and waiver of further reasoning under § 93d Abs. 1 BVerfGG: The dispute involved a parallel constitutional complaint that the court linked to a prior decision of its First Chamber dated May 29, 2012. The decisive legal basis for the dismissal was § 93d (1) sentence 3 of the German Federal Constitutional Court Act (BVerfGG), which permits the court to refrain from providing a further legal justification for non-acceptance decisions, resulting in the exhaustion of the petitioner’s constitutional remedies.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
motivazione inadeguata delle censure costituzionali decisione motivata uguaglianza giuridica costituzionale diritto parlamentare ritiro dell'istanza giudiziaria oggetto della lite

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
§ 93d Abs. 1 Satz 3 BVerfGG
Procedural rule applied to dispense with a further reasoning for the non-acceptance of the constitutional complaint.

Giurisprudenza citata

Generato dall'IA
1 BvR 640/11
BFH failure to refer EU tax finality questions to CJEU under Art. 267(3) TFEU and violation of right to a legally established judge under Art. 101(1) GG
Generato dall'IA
1 BvR 1390/11
Constitutional complaint: Non-acceptance due to parallel decision, waiving justification under § 93d BVerfGG
1 BvR 1403/11
Constitutional complaint non-acceptance via parallel decision citing § 93d BVerfGG
1 BvR 1819/15
Constitutional complaint against a parallel court decision declared inadmissible
1 BvR 1319/20
Constitutional complaint rejected as parallel decision: dispensation with reasoning based on identical prior rulings under § 93d Abs. 1 Satz 3 BVerfGG
1 BvR 2318/14
Constitutional complaint rejected due to non-acceptance without reasoning under § 93d BVerfGG

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
§ 93d Abs. 1 Satz 3 BVerfGG

Procedural rule applied to dispense with a further reasoning for the non-acceptance of the constitutional complaint.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Nichtannahmebeschluss: Parallelentscheidung

[TENOR]

Die Verfassungsbeschwerde wird nicht zur Entscheidung angenommen (vgl. Beschluss der 1. Kammer des Ersten Senats vom 29. Mai

2012 - 1 BvR 640/11).

Von einer weiteren Begründung wird nach § 93d Abs. 1 Satz 3 BVerfGG abgesehen.

Diese Entscheidung ist unanfechtbar.