Constitutional complaint non-acceptance via parallel decision citing § 93d BVerfGG
Sintesi Legislator
Generato dall'IAThe Federal Constitutional Court declined to accept the constitutional complaint for decision, rendering the ruling final and unchallengeable. This Non-Acceptance Decision (Nichtannahmebeschluss) concerns a constitutional challenge filed by an individual against a lower court’s refusal or handling of their case, with the Court citing a parallel decision by the same chamber as the basis for its non-acceptance. The proceedings were terminated without a substantive review on the merits, as the Court waived further reasoning under § 93d Abs. 1 Satz 3 of the Federal Constitutional Court Act (BVerfGG), leaving the lower court’s judgment in force.
Regesto Legislator
Generato dall'IA§ 93d Abs. 1 Satz 3 BVerfGG; Constitutional complaint non-acceptance via parallel decision citing § 93d BVerfGG: This Non-Acceptance Decision (Nichtannahmebeschluss) concerns a constitutional challenge filed by an individual against a lower court’s refusal or handling of their case, with the Court citing a parallel decision by the same chamber as the basis for its non-acceptance. The proceedings were terminated without a substantive review on the merits, as the Court waived further reasoning under § 93d Abs. 1 Satz 3 of the Federal Constitutional Court Act (BVerfGG), leaving the lower court’s judgment in force.
Parole chiave
Generato dall'IADisposizioni normative citate
Generato dall'IAGiurisprudenza citata
Generato dall'IADecisioni correlate
Generato dall'IAQuestioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator
Generato dall'IAProcedural rule cited in the dispositive to justify the waiver of a further written reasoning for the non-acceptance of the constitutional complaint.
Testo completo
Nichtannahmebeschluss: Parallelentscheidung
[TENOR]
Die Verfassungsbeschwerde wird nicht zur Entscheidung angenommen (vgl. Beschluss der 1. Kammer des Ersten Senats vom 29. Mai
2012 - 1 BvR 640/11 -).
Von einer weiteren Begründung wird nach § 93d Abs. 1 Satz 3 BVerfGG abgesehen.
Diese Entscheidung ist unanfechtbar.