Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
1 BvR 1403/11 ECLI:DE:BVerfG:2012:rk20120529.1bvr140311 Generato dall'IA

Constitutional complaint non-acceptance via parallel decision citing § 93d BVerfGG

Numero d'incarto 1 BvR 1403/11
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Germania (DE)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Inammissibile (Inadmissible)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Federal Constitutional Court declined to accept the constitutional complaint for decision, rendering the ruling final and unchallengeable. This Non-Acceptance Decision (Nichtannahmebeschluss) concerns a constitutional challenge filed by an individual against a lower court’s refusal or handling of their case, with the Court citing a parallel decision by the same chamber as the basis for its non-acceptance. The proceedings were terminated without a substantive review on the merits, as the Court waived further reasoning under § 93d Abs. 1 Satz 3 of the Federal Constitutional Court Act (BVerfGG), leaving the lower court’s judgment in force.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

§ 93d Abs. 1 Satz 3 BVerfGG; Constitutional complaint non-acceptance via parallel decision citing § 93d BVerfGG: This Non-Acceptance Decision (Nichtannahmebeschluss) concerns a constitutional challenge filed by an individual against a lower court’s refusal or handling of their case, with the Court citing a parallel decision by the same chamber as the basis for its non-acceptance. The proceedings were terminated without a substantive review on the merits, as the Court waived further reasoning under § 93d Abs. 1 Satz 3 of the Federal Constitutional Court Act (BVerfGG), leaving the lower court’s judgment in force.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
motivazione inadeguata delle censure costituzionali motivazione nel merito conformità costituzionale revoca della decisione amministrativa eccezioni processuali tardive ritiro dell'istanza giudiziaria

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA

Giurisprudenza citata

Generato dall'IA
Generato dall'IA

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
§ 93d Abs. 1 Satz 3 BVerfGG

Procedural rule cited in the dispositive to justify the waiver of a further written reasoning for the non-acceptance of the constitutional complaint.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Nichtannahmebeschluss: Parallelentscheidung

[TENOR]

Die Verfassungsbeschwerde wird nicht zur Entscheidung angenommen (vgl. Beschluss der 1. Kammer des Ersten Senats vom 29. Mai

2012 - 1 BvR 640/11 -).

Von einer weiteren Begründung wird nach § 93d Abs. 1 Satz 3 BVerfGG abgesehen.

Diese Entscheidung ist unanfechtbar.