Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
2 BvE 2/09 ECLI:DE:BVerfG:2012:es20120418.2bve000209 Generato dall'IA

Judge recusal in constitutional litigation: prior legislative participation in the same matter under § 18 Abs. 1 Nr. 2 BVerfGG

Numero d'incarto 2 BvE 2/09
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Germania (DE)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Inammissibile (Inadmissible)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Federal Constitutional Court ordered the exclusion of a sitting judge from the exercise of his judicial duties due to a procedural conflict of interest. The dispute arose in an interstate litigation case where the Antragsgegnerin (respondent) was a specific legislative body, and it was established that the judge had previously served as a member of that same legislative body in two prior convenions while the specific matter at issue was pending, thereby having participated decisively in the underlying decisions. Applying § 18 (1) no. 2 of the Federal Constitutional Court Act, which prohibits judges from participating in a case where they have previously acted as a member of a legislative body on the same subject matter, the Court ruled that the judge must be recused to ensure procedural integrity.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

§ 18 Abs 1 Nr 2 BVerfGG; Judge recusal in constitutional litigation: prior legislative participation in the same matter under § 18 Abs. 1 Nr. 2 BVerfGG: The dispute arose in an interstate litigation case where the Antragsgegnerin (respondent) was a specific legislative body, and it was established that the judge had previously served as a member of that same legislative body in two prior convenions while the specific matter at issue was pending, thereby having participated decisively in the underlying decisions. Applying § 18 (1) no. 2 of the Federal Constitutional Court Act, which prohibits judges from participating in a case where they have previously acted as a member of a legislative body on the same subject matter, the Court ruled that the judge must be recused to ensure procedural integrity.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
conflitto d'interessi atto legislativo decisioni incidentali domanda di ricusazione azione di separazione censura di violazione costituzionale

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Generato dall'IA

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
§ 18 Abs. 1 Nr. 2 BVerfGG

This provision serves as the main ground for the dispositive order, mandating the exclusion of the judge from the case because he previously participated in the same matter as a member of the respondent legislative bodies.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Ausschluss eines Bundesverfassungsrichters von der Mitwirkung an der Entscheidung im Organstreitverfahren - Tätigkeit in selber Sache (§ 18 Abs 1 Nr 2 BVerfGG) aufgrund Mitgliedschaft in 13. und 14. Bundesversammlung, die im vorliegenden Verfahren Antragsgegnerinnen sind

[TENOR]

Der Richter Müller ist von der Ausübung seines Richteramtes ausgeschlossen, weil er in derselben Sache vor seiner Ernennung

zum Richter des Bundesverfassungsgerichts als Mitglied der jeweiligen Antragsgegnerin zu 2. mitentscheidend tätig gewesen

ist (§ 18 Abs. 1 Nr. 2 BVerfGG).