Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
1 BvR 413/12 ECLI:DE:BVerfG:2012:rk20120410.1bvr041312 Generato dall'IA

Constitutional challenge to ultraviolet radiation protection ordinance rejected for lack of exhaustion of legal remedies

Numero d'incarto 1 BvR 413/12
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Germania (DE)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Inammissibile (Inadmissible)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Federal Constitutional Court refused to accept the constitutional complaint for decision, finding it inadmissible, which leaves the challenged ordinance valid and undisturbed. The dispute concerned the constitutionality of a regulation regarding protection from harmful effects of artificial ultraviolet radiation, which the complainant challenged without having previously exhausted ordinary legal remedies. The Court’s decision relied on the principle of subsidiarity, requiring the complainant to first seek specialized judicial relief, such as an administrative declaratory action, and determined that no preliminary ruling on the abstract constitutional validity of the norm was justified given the outstanding questions of ordinary law and fact.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

§ 43 VwGO, § 90 Abs. 2 Satz 2 BVerfGG, § 93d Abs. 1 Satz 3 BVerfGG; Constitutional challenge to ultraviolet radiation protection ordinance rejected for lack of exhaustion of legal remedies: The dispute concerned the constitutionality of a regulation regarding protection from harmful effects of artificial ultraviolet radiation, which the complainant challenged without having previously exhausted ordinary legal remedies. The Court’s decision relied on the principle of subsidiarity, requiring the complainant to first seek specialized judicial relief, such as an administrative declaratory action, and determined that no preliminary ruling on the abstract constitutional validity of the norm was justified given the outstanding questions of ordinary law and fact.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
costituzionalità esaurimento delle vie di ricorso sentenze sulla validità di un atto diritto processuale decisione di accertamento reclamo amministrativo

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
§ 43 VwGO
Rechtsschutz, gegebenenfalls in Form einer verwaltungsgerichtlichen Feststellungsklage gemäß § 43 VwGO, nachsucht (vgl.
§ 90 Abs. 2 Satz 2 BVerfGG
Für eine Vorabentscheidung nach § 90 Abs. 2 Satz 2 BVerfGG besteht angesichts der von der Beschwerdeführerin aufgeworfenen
§ 93d Abs. 1 Satz 3 BVerfGG
Von einer weiteren Begründung wird nach § 93d Abs. 1 Satz 3 BVerfGG abgesehen.

Giurisprudenza citata

Generato dall'IA
BVerfGE 115, 81
Generato dall'IA
1 BvR 1565/10
Constitutional complaint rejected for lack of exhausted legal remedies following remand by appellate court and no objective arbitrariness in lower court's legal application
1 BvR 216/18
Constitutional complaint challenging refusal of effective legal remedy
1 BvR 1484/23
Constitutional admissibility of challenges to state constitutional court rulings: failure to substantiate violation of federal right to effective legal protection
1 BvR 2390/14
Constitutional complaint rejected for failure to exhaust legal remedies and insufficient substantiation
1 BvR 599/22
Constitutional complaint rejected for failure to exhaust legal remedies and insufficient substantiation; denial of non-lawyer legal representative for lack of necessity and utility

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Nichtannahmebeschluss: Unzulässige Rechtssatzverfassungsbeschwerde gegen "Verordnung zum Schutz vor schädlichen Wirkungen künstlicher ultravioletter Strahlung" (juris: UVSV) - Keine Veranlassung für Vorabentscheidung (§ 90 Abs 2 S 2 BVerfGG) über Verfassungsmäßigkeit vor Rechtswegerschöpfung

[GRUENDE]

Die Verfassungsbeschwerde wird nicht zur Entscheidung angenommen, weil sie unzulässig ist.

Der Grundsatz der Subsidiarität der Verfassungsbeschwerde gebietet, dass die Beschwerdeführerin zunächst um fachgerichtlichen

Rechtsschutz, gegebenenfalls in Form einer verwaltungsgerichtlichen Feststellungsklage gemäß § 43 VwGO, nachsucht (vgl. BVerfGE

115, 81 ).

Für eine Vorabentscheidung nach § 90 Abs. 2 Satz 2 BVerfGG besteht angesichts der von der Beschwerdeführerin aufgeworfenen

einfachrechtlichen und tatsächlichen Fragen keine Veranlassung.

Von einer weiteren Begründung wird nach § 93d Abs. 1 Satz 3 BVerfGG abgesehen.

Diese Entscheidung ist unanfechtbar.