Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
2 BvF 3/05, 2 BvG 3/05, 2 BvF 1/06 ECLI:DE:BVerfG:2011:fs20110713.2bvf000305 Generato dall'IA

Constitutional compatibility of § 11 FinAusglG 2005 with Art. 107(2) GG regarding federal financial assistance for extreme state budgetary crises

Numero d'incarto 2 BvF 3/05, 2 BvG 3/05, 2 BvF 1/06
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Germania (DE)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio struck_off
Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Federal Constitutional Court dismissed the combined abstract norm control proceedings and inter-state dispute as the applicants withdrew their motions, with no public interest grounds remaining to continue the litigation. The dispute concerned the compatibility of Section 11 of the Federal Financial Equalization Act 2005 with Article 107(2), sentence 3 of the Basic Law, specifically challenging the federal government's obligation to provide financial assistance to a constituent state due to an extreme budgetary crisis. The court based its decision on procedural rules governing the withdrawal of applications, noting that such withdrawal results in dismissal of the proceedings unless public interest dictates otherwise, a condition not met in this instance.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Constitutional compatibility of § 11 FinAusglG 2005 with Art. 107(2) GG regarding federal financial assistance for extreme state budgetary crises: The dispute concerned the compatibility of Section 11 of the Federal Financial Equalization Act 2005 with Article 107(2), sentence 3 of the Basic Law, specifically challenging the federal government's obligation to provide financial assistance to a constituent state due to an extreme budgetary crisis. The court based its decision on procedural rules governing the withdrawal of applications, noting that such withdrawal results in dismissal of the proceedings unless public interest dictates otherwise, a condition not met in this instance.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
costituzionalità regole di bilancio causa interstatuale aiuto finanziario dovere statale soccorso d'emergenza costituzionale

Giurisprudenza citata

Generato dall'IA
BVerfGE 115, 394
BVerfGE 115, 394 , m.w.N.).
Generato dall'IA
2 BvF 1/13
Constitutionality of Financial Equalization and Supplementary Federal Grant Provisions in Terminated Abstract Norm Control Following Applicant Withdrawal
1 BvR 1728/12, 1 BvR 1756/12
Constitutionality of social insurance contribution transfers to the general state budget for transitional period and netted federal subsidies under the principle of equal burden
2 BvF 1/22
Constitutional validity of retroactive transfer of emergency credit authorizations to a special fund: debt-brake limits and annual budget principles
2 BvR 1099/10
Constitutional validity of €123 billion state guarantee authorization for European Financial Stability Facility and interim relief against financial stability commitments
XI B 104/21
Constitutional admissibility of challenging fixed statutory interest rates under the equality principle

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Einstellung zweier abstrakter Normenkontrollverfahrens sowie eines Bund-Länder-Streitverfahrens nach Antragsrücknahme - Vereinbarkeit von § 11 FinAusglG 2005 mit Art 107 Abs 2 S 3 GG, Hilfeleistungspflicht des Bundes zugunsten des Saarlandes wegen extremer Lage des Landeshaushalts

[GRUENDE]

Die Antragsteller haben die Anträge, durch die die vorliegenden Verfahren eingeleitet wurden, mit Schriftsätzen vom 1. April

2011 und vom 11. April 2011 zurückgenommen. Die verbundenen Verfahren sind einzustellen, da Gründe des öffentlichen Interesses

für eine Fortführung nicht gegeben sind (vgl. BVerfGE 115, 394 , m.w.N.).