Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
1 BvR 2018/10 ECLI:DE:BVerfG:2011:rk20110505.1bvr201810 Generato dall'IA

Commencement of limitation period for trustee's release claim; no indications of fundamental rights violation

Numero d'incarto 1 BvR 2018/10
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Germania (DE)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Inammissibile (Inadmissible)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Federal Constitutional Court declined to accept the constitutional complaint, finding it lacked a prospect of success and did not meet the requirements for admission under § 93a Abs. 2 BVerfGG, thereby leaving the challenged lower court decisions in force. The dispute concerned the commencement of the regular limitation period for a trustee's claim for release (Befreiungsanspruch), where the complainant argued that the judicial decisions violated her fundamental rights. The Court determined that there were no indications of a fundamental rights violation based on the pleadings and exercised its discretion under § 93d Abs. 1 Satz 3 BVerfGG to forgo further reasoning, noting the decision is final and unappealable.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

§ 93a Abs. 2 BVerfGG, § 93d Abs. 1 Satz 3 BVerfGG; Commencement of limitation period for trustee's release claim; no indications of fundamental rights violation: 2 BVerfGG, thereby leaving the challenged lower court decisions in force. The dispute concerned the commencement of the regular limitation period for a trustee's claim for release (Befreiungsanspruch), where the complainant argued that the judicial decisions violated her fundamental rights. The Court determined that there were no indications of a fundamental rights violation based on the pleadings and exercised its discretion under § 93d Abs. 1 Satz 3 BVerfGG to forgo further reasoning, noting the decision is final and unappealable.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
decorrenza della prescrizione diritti fondamentali requisito costituzionale potere d'apprezzamento del giudice ricorso costituzionale all'estero prescrizione della pena

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
§ 93a Abs. 2 BVerfGG
Cited in the first order to establish the legal basis for the decision not to accept the constitutional complaint.
§ 93d Abs. 1 Satz 3 BVerfGG
Cited in the second order to justify the omission of a further detailed reasoning.
Generato dall'IA
2 BvR 1089/18 - Vz 2/19
BVerfG delay complaint: unavailing challenge to lower court proceedings' duration due to statutory scope limitation on § 97b BVerfGG
2 BvR 2227/19
Constitutional complaint against denial of reinstatement after missed appeal deadline: lack of particularly weighty fundamental rights violation
2 BvR 30/21
Reinstatement of rights denied for failure to substantiate non-fault in missing constitutional complaint deadline
2 BvR 1912/12
Constitutional complaint on excessive disciplinary procedure duration and exhaustion of compensation remedies under § 198 GVG
1 BvR 2543/21
Constitutional complaint over vehicle theft prosecution: failure to prosecute within statutory deadline and insufficient demonstration of fundamental rights violation

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
§ 93a Abs. 2 BVerfGG

Cited in the first order to establish the legal basis for the decision not to accept the constitutional complaint.

§ 93d Abs. 1 Satz 3 BVerfGG

Cited in the second order to justify the omission of a further detailed reasoning.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Nichtannahmebeschluss: Beginn der regelmäßigen Verjährungsfrist für Befreiungsanspruch des Treuhänders - keine Anhaltspunkte für Grundrechtsverletzung durch angegriffene Entscheidungen

[GRUENDE]

Die Verfassungsbeschwerde ist nicht zur Entscheidung anzunehmen, weil die Voraussetzungen dafür nicht vorliegen (§ 93a Abs.

2 BVerfGG). Der Verfassungsbeschwerde kommt keine grundsätzliche verfassungsrechtliche Bedeutung zu. Ihre Annahme ist auch

nicht zur Durchsetzung der Grundrechte oder grundrechtsgleichen Rechte der Beschwerdeführerin angezeigt; denn sie hat keine

Aussicht auf Erfolg. Anhaltspunkte dafür, dass die angegriffenen Entscheidungen gegen die als verletzt gerügten verfassungsmäßigen

Rechte der Beschwerdeführerin verstoßen könnten, sind auf der Grundlage des Vorbringens der Verfassungsbeschwerde nicht ersichtlich.

Von einer weiteren Begründung wird nach § 93d Abs. 1 Satz 3 BVerfGG abgesehen.

Diese Entscheidung ist unanfechtbar.